Teams

NITA S 40W40e Score-Knutte

2024 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-13vs NITA S 40W40c Tam-CoreyWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristine Lonsway / Laurie Knutte vs Emily Paris / Tina Kayne6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatherine Mattison vs Teodora Varcheva6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Galligan Kuc / Jill Odenbeck vs Erin Alvarez / Alja Hessami-Maas7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Rowen / Ngozi Ezike vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Dawn Baumann / Martha Davis4-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGrace Kuhrt vs Haina Shin3-6, 3-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Andrea Galligan Kuc vs Silvia Kusaka / Anna Dau3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Good / Crystal Leighton vs Kristine Jurczyk / Jennifer Langtry2-6, 5-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJill Odenbeck / Marinne Leonard vs Kristine Jurczyk / Jennifer Langtry7-6, 1-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Richards / Nancy Cushing vs Anna Dau / Huan Chang3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Cindy Bielik vs Martha Davis / Dawn Baumann3-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs NITA S 40W40a Rush Copley-AdamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Odenbeck / Kelly Good vs Cindy Sullivan / Anitra Willis1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Crystal Leighton vs Joanne Lund / Stephanie Batka6-4, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Richards / Cindy Bielik vs Soraya McTeague / Denise Seal6-3, 6-1
2024-06-17vs NITA S 40W40c Tam-CoreyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Ngozi Ezike vs Erica Eisner / Conni Stinek6-7, 3-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Julie Weidner / Fran Wiechart6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarinne Leonard / Laurie Knutte vs Tina Kayne / Angela Hanson6-3, 5-3
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Rebecca Bosack vs Marla Gerard / Gayle Dominicis6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDace Lilo vs Donna Matkovic6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Odenbeck / Katherine Mattison vs Debra Brambora / Lori Saguto3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristine Lonsway / Andrea Galligan Kuc vs Laury Scheyer / Cathy Evangelist7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Kimberly Ricchio / Patricia Wright7-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Rebecca Bosack vs Gayle Dominicis / Debra Brambora6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGrace Kuhrt / Cindy Bielik vs Eileen Demoll / Mary Etherington6-3, 5-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Nancy Cushing vs Julie Sujack / Karen Hunter6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCindy Bielik / Lisa Rowen vs Deborah Poe / Katrin Maldre4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Galligan Kuc / Kristine Lonsway vs Anastasia Valentine / Erica Block7-6, 4-2
2024-05-18vs NITA S 40W40a Rush Copley-AdamsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Bielik / Laurie Knutte vs Beverly Paperiello / Palida Jameson7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarinne Leonard / Grace Kuhrt vs Joanne Lund / Jane Girard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Good / Jill Odenbeck vs Stephanie Batka / Anitra Willis6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Nancy Cushing vs Kristin Collins / Robin Behre6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDace Lilo vs Katey Woltman6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Good / Lisa Rowen vs Julie Sujack / Annette Hennessy3-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Andrea Galligan Kuc vs Erica Block / Anastasia Valentine7-6, 2-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Wright9132828268
2NITA S 40W40e Score-Knutte82291132308
3NITA S 40W40c Tam-Corey35102246306
4NITA S 40W40d Oak Park-Hennessy/Block35102247306
5NITA S 40W40a Rush Copley-Adams37162450357
6NITA S 40W40f Health Track-Ricchio/Brambora17112145303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Grace Kuhrt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Crystal Leighton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.06
Cindy Bielik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.01
Rebecca Bosack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Ngozi Ezike
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Jill Odenbeck
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.93
Nancy Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.91
Laurie Knutte
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.78
Lisa Rowen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Marinne Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Andrea Galligan Kuc
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Abigail Emerson
published 4
3.62
Dace Lilo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Kelly Good
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Halle McCormick
published
Katherine Mattison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kristine Lonsway
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marinne Leonard + Rebecca Bosack4167% games+14.6% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Cindy Bielik10461% games+10.1% vs expected
Crystal Leighton + Grace Kuhrt24764% games+8.5% vs expected
Cindy Bielik + Jill Odenbeck3457% games+7.5% vs expected
Laurie Knutte + Rebecca Bosack12460% games+5.7% vs expected
Ngozi Ezike + Lisa Rowen11266% games+5.4% vs expected
Marinne Leonard + Cindy Bielik11558% games+4.7% vs expected
Kristine Lonsway + Laurie Knutte241355% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grace Kuhrt
134W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
4.08
4
Cindy Bielik
202W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Rebecca Bosack
118W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Ngozi Ezike
283W–165L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Jill Odenbeck
193W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Nancy Cushing
212W–107L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Laurie Knutte
255W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Lisa Rowen
152W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Marinne Leonard
154W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Andrea Galligan Kuc
102W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Abigail Emerson
45W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dace Lilo
12W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Kelly Good
105W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Halle McCormick
20W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Mattison
44W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Lonsway
93W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.