Teams

Fitzgerald/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-16vs Ossman/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandra Elliott / Debra Hutjens vs Rhonda Petrin / Donna Demouy6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJane Ringel / Thalia Kahl vs Suzanne Camping / Nancy Russell7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs Delves/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Elliott / Debra Hutjens vs Katie Feyes / Stephanie Feyes6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKate Elasy / Kathy Hirsekorn vs Kelly Dawson / Elisa Hill1-6, 4-6
2025-07-09vs Mangialardi/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Sarah Green vs Joyce Quirk / Conde Devine7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoy Helton / Jane Ringel vs Cynthia Walker / Diana Porter2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesColleen Wilson / Kathy Hirsekorn vs Patricia Powers / Martha Melson6-3, 6-2
2025-06-26vs ThPM-Blevins /Thomas/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Sandra Elliott vs Rachel Fogarty / Cari Blevins4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Ringel / Mary Carkhuff vs Ellen Gooden / Catherine Pietsch1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesColleen Wilson / Kathy Hirsekorn vs Stephanie Protz / Sherri Jones7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-11vs Ossman/NashvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Carkhuff / Thalia Kahl vs Sara Baker / Suzanne Camping4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Fujiyoshi / Kathy Hirsekorn vs Vesna Pavlovic / Elita Shalkevich0-6, 3-6
2025-06-04vs Mangialardi/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesKate Elasy / Carol Fujiyoshi vs Patricia Powers / Barbara Zwerner1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kathleen Carbonari
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Debra Hutjens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Cindy Mccullough
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Maura Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Sandra Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Lily Qu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jane Ringel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Joy Helton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Carol Fujiyoshi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Kathy Hirsekorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Kate Elasy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Colleen Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Wilson + Kathy Hirsekorn5554% games+6.9% vs expected
Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari33563% games+5.0% vs expected
Joy Helton + Mary Carkhuff224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
89W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Debra Hutjens
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Cindy Mccullough
56W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Maura Fitzgerald
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sandra Elliott
51W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Thalia Kahl
27W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Lily Qu
24W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Mary Carkhuff
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Jane Ringel
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Joy Helton
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Carol Fujiyoshi
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kathy Hirsekorn
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Kate Elasy
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Colleen Wilson
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.