Teams

Motichek 18/5.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesEvan Bailey / Alexander Vichinsky vs Mike Morgan / Kevin Alario6-3, 6-2
2025-09-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Lucas / Christopher Stant vs Tyler Crochet / John Ross Donnes2-6, 0-6
2025-08-20vs Tusa 18/5.5/M/TchefunctaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEvan Bailey / Christopher Stant vs Mike Morgan / Jordan Nash1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMark Lucas / Alexander Vichinsky vs Justin Clinton / Nathaniel Parks6-1, 6-0
2025-08-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBradley Johnson / Christopher Stant vs Karl Schulze / Brad Lewis2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Matherne 18/5.5/M/N.CYPRESS802226110
2Motichek 18/5.5/M/Pelican53131126218
3Faucheux 18/5.5/M/Beau Chene35101431226
4Tusa 18/5.5/M/Tchefuncta3591533245
5Schulze 18/5.5/M/N Cypress1761837247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Evan Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.58
Alexander Klocek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Alexander Mata Iv
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.27
Alexander Vichinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Christopher Stant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Dennis Boushie Jr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jason Landry
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Joseph Kanode
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Landon Brown
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Motichek + Alexander Klocek213 matchesnot enough data
Travis Motichek + Alexander Mata Iv033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Evan Bailey
10W–11L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Alexander Klocek
11W–8L career · type M · 10 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Alexander Mata Iv
14W–32L career · type S · 16 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.44
2.5
Alexander Vichinsky
5W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Christopher Stant
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dennis Boushie Jr
1W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Landry
7W–15L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Kanode
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Brown
10W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lucas
17W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.