Teams

Tusa 18/5.5/M/Tchefuncta

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Tusa / Nathaniel Parks vs Jason Landry / Alexander Mata Iv2-6, 5-7
2025-09-03vs Matherne 18/5.5/M/N.CYPRESSLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoss Ledoux / Jordan Heltz vs Tyler Crochet / Jean Paul Templet2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Nash / Nathaniel Parks vs Connor Seale / Alan Cox0-6, 3-6
2025-09-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNader Shourbaji / Nathaniel Parks vs Christopher Hess / Karl Schulze2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Motichek 18/5.5/M/PelicanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Clinton / Nathaniel Parks vs Mark Lucas / Alexander Vichinsky1-6, 0-6
2025-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Tusa / Nathaniel Parks vs Jared Matherne / Jean Paul Templet1-6, 3-6
2025-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoss Ledoux / Jordan Heltz vs Nathan Naquin / Brad Lewis7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Chris Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Chase Bordelon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.14
Baldwin Barkerding
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
Evan Graybill
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Jeffrey Hufft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jordan Heltz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Nash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Justin Clinton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kevin Alario
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Mike Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Nader Shourbaji
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Nathaniel Parks
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ross Ledoux
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Alario + Justin Clinton0519% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Nathaniel Parks044 matchesnot enough data
Baldwin Barkerding + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Ross Ledoux033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Nathaniel Parks033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Ross Ledoux + Jordan Heltz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Tusa
8W–36L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
2.5
Chase Bordelon
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Baldwin Barkerding
2W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Evan Graybill
0W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Hufft
2W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Heltz
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Nash
8W–12L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Clinton
1W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Alario
1W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Morgan
5W–22L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nader Shourbaji
8W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathaniel Parks
0W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Ledoux
5W–16L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.