Teams

CV-Mission Hills CC/L Lober

2022 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-14vs CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesPage Garcia / Camille Lamoureux vs Wendi Varley / Connie Masciorini6-3, 6-2
2022-05-07vs CV-Indian Wells TC/Jo BailinWon 10
W#1 DoublesPage Garcia / Camille Lamoureux vs Colleen Ecker / Gayle Friedman6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCamille Lamoureux / Susan Devereaux vs Dori Craft / Lorna Matthew6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Camille Lamoureux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Mary Kaump
published
3.45
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.08
2.94
Nancy Pacharzina
published
2.81
Erica Carpenter
published 3
2.69
Ann Robinow
published 3
2.43
Laurie Lober
published
Julie Henthorn
published
Laura Susskind
published
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
published
Michelle Patton
published
Page Garcia
published
Susan Devereaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Robinow + Obsidiana Abril-Horpel3943% games−5.8% vs expected
Michelle Patton + Susan Devereaux404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Lamoureux
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Mary Kaump
27W–24L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Ann Tennyson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Obsidiana Abril-Horpel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Nancy Pacharzina
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.94
3
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ann Robinow
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Laurie Lober
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Julie Henthorn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Susskind
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Patton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Page Garcia
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.