Teams

Ke.Townsend40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.78 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-11vs Ti.Santospago40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesGillian Sellick / Camille Conzola vs Christy Team / Kellie Chesson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarey Baddour / Kelly Townsend vs Sarah Bell / Beth Rives4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMeghan Rider / Suzanne Schell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-10vs Ki.Patrey40C7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesCarey Baddour / Laura Ross vs Stacy Rank / Brenda Li3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGillian Sellick / Vanese Clough vs Carolyn Lee / Wendy Lindberg4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Rider / Yuwie Hager vs Ilona Peszlen / Angela Baxley6-2, 6-3
2024-10-04vs Me.Tharrington40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesGillian Sellick / McKenzie Keenan Osman vs Amanda Williams / Melanie Tharrington7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJamie Middledorf / Kelly Townsend vs Heather Brewer / Adrienne Brewer2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Vanese Clough vs Mindy Edwards / Amie Irby6-3, 6-4
2024-09-26vs Je.McIntyre40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Middledorf / Laura Ross vs Joanna Brooks / Anne Elizabeth Harrell6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Shelby / Camille Conzola vs Hilary Kuss / Kimberly Monsees7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarey Baddour / Rachel Matthews vs Carrie Vander Vennet / Bunny Ratledge7-5, 6-3
2024-09-06vs Su.Knowles40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Rider / Yuwie Hager vs Ginger Sluder / Sarah Schmalz6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Vanese Clough vs Cindy Faltisco / Mary Margaret Patton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs Me.Tharrington40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesGillian Sellick / Yuwie Hager vs Heather Brewer / Adrienne Brewer6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarey Baddour / Laura Ross vs Meredith Barnette / Melanie Tharrington6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJamie Middledorf / Kelly Townsend vs Alvina Oelhafen / Lauren Stump6-4, 6-3
2024-08-23vs Ke.Allen40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Shelby / Yuwie Hager vs Keri Allen / Chrissy Hederick6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJamie Middledorf / Vanese Clough vs Kesah DeLisio / Julee Knight6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / McKenzie Keenan Osman vs Ann Bowler / Carla Williams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-16vs Ti.Santospago40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Shelby / Camille Conzola vs Kristin Rice / Tina Santospago7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeghan Rider / Vanese Clough vs Christy Team / Cara Kuremsky6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMcKenzie Keenan Osman / Rachel Matthews vs Barbara Callahan / Brenda Coules6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Gillian Sellick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Yuwie Hager
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Jamie Middledorf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Sarah Shelby
published
3.65
Carey Baddour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Meghan Rider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.37
McKenzie Keenan Osman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Camille Conzola
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Kelly Townsend
published
3.27
Vanese Clough
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Conzola + Gillian Sellick4255% games−5.9% vs expected
Kelly Townsend + Vanese Clough1534% games−12.3% vs expected
Yuwie Hager + Vanese Clough7459% gamesnot enough data
Yuwie Hager + Gillian Sellick8164% gamesnot enough data
Gillian Sellick + Vanese Clough4253% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Grieco + Carey Baddour3251% gamesnot enough data
Camille Conzola + Kelly Townsend4159% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Grieco + Vanese Clough224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gillian Sellick
119W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Yuwie Hager
168W–78L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Jamie Middledorf
140W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Sarah Shelby
49W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Carey Baddour
237W–204L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Meghan Rider
341W–169L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–186L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
McKenzie Keenan Osman
129W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Camille Conzola
258W–178L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Kelly Townsend
28W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Vanese Clough
173W–150L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.