Teams

HCC - Aldeen/Wissel

2022 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-20vs HCC Racq Pacq- Abrams/MeansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMcKenzie O'Brien / Kelly Sincich vs Stephanie Means / Mollie Simpson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-13vs Hills/GiangLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Sincich / Michele Ironsmith vs Elaine Aschenbrenner / Asbel Giang6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMcKenzie O'Brien / Kelly Sincich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-30vs HCC Racq Pacq- Abrams/MeansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Kelly Sincich vs Mollie Simpson / Maki Smith3-6, 3-6
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Freeman / Michele Ironsmith vs Cassandra Remedios / Joy DSa4-6, 4-6
2022-07-16vs TYCC Yachts of Shots - J. GarlickWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Freeman / Michele Ironsmith vs Jennifer Drukteinis / Aspen Kahl6-3, 6-2
2022-07-09vs HCC Racq Pacq- Abrams/MeansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMcKenzie O'Brien / Mary Paul vs Mollie Simpson / Stephanie Wager0-6, 1-6
2022-06-25vs Hills/GiangLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Freeman / Michele Ironsmith vs Asbel Giang / Cassandra Remedios3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-18vs TYCC Yachts of Shots - J. GarlickWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Freeman / Michele Ironsmith vs Jennifer Drukteinis / Andria Owen6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Farheen Aldeen
published 4.5
4.21
Kelly Sincich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
McKenzie O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Tish Wissel
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.41
Dara Bilardello
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Polk
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Sincich + Michele Ironsmith2349% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Sincich + McKenzie O'Brien213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.51
4.5
Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Kelly Sincich
58W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
McKenzie O'Brien
74W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Dara Bilardello
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lisa Polk
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.