Teams

MEMPK LANGER

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-31vs CSCC SPANTONLost 23
L#1 DoublesKirsten Matheson / Carol Presicci vs Sutton Spanton / Erin Rhodes2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Langer vs Karen Ohl2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Ragauss / Jennifer Furr vs Lou Ann McClendon / Mary Beth Yockey6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMary Bahner vs Lori Bayne3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-22vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Reta McKee vs Diane Fredell / Linda Edgar4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-15vs CSRC BROCKLost 05
L#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Kelly Cavanaugh / Diane Burton0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Langer vs Cassandra Spero0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Furr / Reta McKee vs Stephanie Brock / Martha Walker6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMary Bahner vs Vincenta van Every3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFaith Collins / Carol Presicci vs Kim Roff / Christi Andress3-6, 6-7
2025-05-08vs CCW YOUNGWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Langer / Amanda Irons vs Erin Contreras / Kele Hauke6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-01vs FLYHS COUTURELost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Ragauss / Amanda Irons vs Kristi Couture / Kady Brown1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-24vs CSCC SPANTONLost 14
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Carol Presicci vs Michele Hoelscher-Ayers / Jennifer Gonzales1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaria Langer vs Karen Ohl3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Furr / Faith Collins vs Lou Ann McClendon / Erin Rhodes0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Ragauss vs Lori Bayne6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Matheson / Mary Bahner vs Jennifer Peck / Mary Beth Yockey0-6, 0-6
2025-04-17vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Sara Callender / Ginny Hood6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Emily Ragauss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.21
Maria Langer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Jennifer Furr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Carol Presicci
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Caron Dumler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Faith Collins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Katherine Crumpton
published
2.89
Reta McKee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Kirsten Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Bahner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Furr + Reta McKee4546% games+3.8% vs expected
Caron Dumler + Amanda Irons5948% games−5.1% vs expected
Katherine Crumpton + Kirsten Matheson033 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Matheson + Carol Presicci123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Ragauss
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Maria Langer
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Presicci
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Caron Dumler
52W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Faith Collins
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Katherine Crumpton
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Reta McKee
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kirsten Matheson
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.80
Mary Bahner
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.