Teams

LTFCS WISNER

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-29vs CSRC BROCKWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Fredell / Julie Haynie vs Stephanie Brock / DARLENE WARMOUTH7-6, 6-1
2025-05-15vs FLYHS COUTURESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Sue Arntzen vs Kristi Couture / Kady Brown0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Edgar / Jane Wisner vs Tisha Hickerson / Katie Schaller Amechazurra7-6, 7-5
2025-05-08vs CSCC SPANTONLost 05
L#1 DoublesDiane Fredell / Shelly Schmidt vs Michele Hoelscher-Ayers / Megan Ramey3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErin Reed vs Karen Ohl1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesXiaohong Zhang / Sue Arntzen vs Jennifer Gonzales / Mary Beth Yockey2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWen Huang vs Lori Bayne0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGinny Hood / Sara Callender vs Jennifer Peck / Erin Rhodes4-6, 1-6
2025-05-01vs CCW YOUNGSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Elizabeth Wood vs Tracy Slater / Leslie Leaf1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Edgar / Jane Wisner vs Irene Mo / Karen Shuman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs CSRC BROCKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesXiaohong Zhang / Julie Haynie vs Stephanie Brock / Martha Walker7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Diane Burton / Vikki ONeil6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-17vs MEMPK LANGERWon 10
W#2 DoublesSue Arntzen / Julie Haynie vs Jennifer Furr / Faith Collins6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Julie Haynie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Diane Fredell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Wen Huang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Lisa Bischoff
published
3.14
Sue Arntzen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jane Wisner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Wood
published 3.5
3.07
Linda Edgar
published
3.05
Xiaohong Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sara Callender
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Erin Reed
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Ginny Hood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Haynie + Elizabeth Wood5063% games+2.7% vs expected
Sara Callender + Ginny Hood4649% games+0.5% vs expected
Sara Callender + Lisa Bischoff3353% games+0.3% vs expected
Jane Wisner + Linda Edgar312553% games−1.0% vs expected
Sara Callender + Sue Arntzen3348% games−3.1% vs expected
Sue Arntzen + Lisa Bischoff2355% gamesnot enough data
Sara Callender + Xiaohong Zhang033 matchesnot enough data
Sue Arntzen + Julie Haynie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Haynie
22W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Diane Fredell
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Wen Huang
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Lisa Bischoff
27W–27L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Sue Arntzen
17W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jane Wisner
89W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elizabeth Wood
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Linda Edgar
36W–29L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Xiaohong Zhang
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Sara Callender
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Erin Reed
64W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ginny Hood
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.