Teams

Eastern/Choe/18&Over4.0W

2021 18&Over Women · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-14vs All About That AceWon 40
W#1 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Karen Sitton vs Anna Aguilar / Mariela Zelaya6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Trisha Dugan vs Tomira Rozar / Patricia Travers6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristy Gilbert vs Iris Jungherr6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanielle Cawood / Diane Gimbel vs Yi-Fan Hu / Hannah McLaughlin6-3, 6-4
2021-07-07vs All About That AceWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulia Cho / Edina Jung vs Mieko KIMURA / Wanda Nadal1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Trisha Dugan vs Yi-Fan Hu / Judy Choi6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKristy Gilbert vs Erika Bradley6-2, 6-2
2021-06-30vs All About That AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Lainie Goldstein vs Rebecca Wehrle / Hannah McLaughlin6-1, 6-3
2021-06-23vs All About That AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Cho / Lucia Gagnon vs Mieko KIMURA / Rebecca Wehrle6-4, 6-4
2021-06-16vs All About That AceWon 20
W#2 DoublesLucia Gagnon / Edina Jung vs Mieko KIMURA / Rebecca Wehrle6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Jaimee Lubniewski vs Mariela Zelaya / Joan Perricone6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-09vs All About That AceWon 30
W#1 DoublesAntaeya Foster / Edina Jung vs Erika Bradley / Mariela Zelaya6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Emerson / Lucia Gagnon vs Tracy Jones-Henry / Hannah McLaughlin7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulia Cho / Wendy Boiardi vs Joan Perricone / Ji Park6-1, 6-1
2021-06-02vs All About That AceLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucia Gagnon / Robin McFadden vs Patricia Travers / Rebecca Wehrle6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Cho / Karen Sitton vs Tomira Rozar / Tracy Jones-Henry4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDanielle Cawood vs Iris Jungherr6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-26vs All About That AceWon 21
W#2 DoublesJulia Cho / Laura Emerson vs Pekleng Hom / Wanda Nadal7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDanielle Cawood vs Anna Aguilar7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Trisha Dugan vs Ji Park / Annika Ahlstrom2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Choe/18&Over4.0W7131924289
2All About That Ace1793166433

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Antaeya Foster
usually #1 Singles 52%, also #2 Singles 19% · published 4.5
4.15
Laura Emerson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Gabriela Medina
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4.5
4.05
Wendy Boiardi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.86
Roge Nesbitt
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.80
Edina Jung
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Trisha Dugan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Bobby Choe
published 4
3.71
Julia Cho
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Danielle Cawood
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Karen Sitton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kristy Gilbert
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Lainie Goldstein
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Lucia Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Gilbert + Edina Jung3260% games+7.6% vs expected
Julia Cho + Wendy Boiardi191650% games+2.4% vs expected
Karen Sitton + Wendy Boiardi2351% games+0.8% vs expected
Roge Nesbitt + Victoria Madonna1259952% games+0.3% vs expected
Gabriela Medina + Antaeya Foster5453% games−0.5% vs expected
Julia Cho + Laura Emerson3444% games−4.4% vs expected
Trisha Dugan + Wendy Boiardi5648% games−8.1% vs expected
Laura Emerson + Antaeya Foster5082% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Antaeya Foster
91W–35L career · 25 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Emerson
177W–142L career · 9 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Gabriela Medina
54W–38L career · 13 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Wendy Boiardi
130W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Roge Nesbitt
235W–170L career · 12 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Edina Jung
118W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.80
Trisha Dugan
28W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Victoria Madonna
240W–163L career · 10 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bobby Choe
279W–210L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Julia Cho
127W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Danielle Cawood
45W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
Karen Sitton
36W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristy Gilbert
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lainie Goldstein
30W–26L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lucia Gagnon
37W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.