Teams

Sugar Creek (Arlene Reese)*

USTA Atlanta Spring - Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Adriane Ivey
published 3.5
3.51
Marsha Johnson
published
Amy Shakir
published 3.5
Danielle Lewis
published 3.5
3.01
Cynthia Griffin
published 3
2.98
Arlene Reese
published 3
2.95
Aneesh Khan
published 3
2.95
Beverly Terrell
published 3
2.92
Janelle Blasingame
published
2.81
Kimberly Trent
published
2.80
Calvin SHAKIR
published 3
Corey Thompson
published 3
Matthew Sugarman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Calvin SHAKIR + Marsha Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriane Ivey
64W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Marsha Johnson
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Amy Shakir
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Lewis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cynthia Griffin
28W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Arlene Reese
51W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Aneesh Khan
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Beverly Terrell
36W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Janelle Blasingame
32W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kimberly Trent
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Calvin SHAKIR
8W–6L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Corey Thompson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Emmanuel Odame-Adams
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Sugarman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.