Teams

Mackay/55/3.5/WD/BREC

2025 BR Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (55&O) Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-10vs Braud/55/3.5/WD/SOACWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Babin / MaryClaire Hotard vs Brooke Dynes / Donna Erwin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGerry MacKay / Lisa Loupe vs Jeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Obrien / Kellye Moody vs Lisa Garland / Jean Gremillion6-1, 6-4
2025-02-10vs Braud/55/3.5/WD/SOACWon 21
L#1 DoublesGerry MacKay / Barbara Morris vs Brooke Dynes / Donna Erwin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Loupe / Katherine Overland vs Ingrid Osuna / Patti Nelson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebora K Hartman / MaryClaire Hotard vs Jeannette Braud / Jean Gremillion6-2, 6-3
2025-01-25vs Braud/55/3.5/WD/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Loupe / Diane Hebert vs Jeannette Braud / Ingrid Osuna2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebora K Hartman / MaryClaire Hotard vs Staci Buhler / Lisa Garland6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Babin / Kellye Moody vs Brooke Dynes / Donna Erwin0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Katherine Overland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Debora K Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
MaryClaire Hotard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Allison Sanchez
published 3.5
Barbara Morris
published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Loupe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Diane Hebert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kellye Moody
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Gerry MacKay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Janet Babin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debora K Hartman + Katherine Overland3355% games−4.3% vs expected
MaryClaire Hotard + Debora K Hartman314 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Overland + Lisa Loupe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Overland
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Debora K Hartman
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
MaryClaire Hotard
26W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Allison Sanchez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Morris
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Loupe
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Diane Hebert
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kellye Moody
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Gerry MacKay
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Janet Babin
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.