Teams

CACM BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs CM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngie Sanders / Jo Anna Cline vs Mindy Franks / Kristen Daley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Thomas / Nola Nelson vs Terri Cohen / Kass Schwappach6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Ashmore-Guin / Kay Roesch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-13vs WP REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesLissa Moon / Catherine Corbett vs Kristin Barry / Sarah Grimmer7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNancy Hallowell vs Kristin Loudis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngie Shappell / Anne Brehmer vs Natalie Hirschfeld / Kate Anderson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Murray / Kay Roesch vs Denise Fisher / Anna Jones6-3, 7-5
2022-07-11vs DTP GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesAngie Sanders / Jo Anna Cline vs Carmencita Lewis / Helen Young6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNancy Hallowell vs Jaylyn Bunning6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Lissa Moon vs Tanya Taylor / Sally Berglund6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Murray / Anne Brehmer vs Sarah Gieringer / Cynthia Smith6-3, 6-2
2022-06-27vs SKY BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngie Shappell / Anne Brehmer vs Jane Gonnella / Tori Hutchens6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNancy Hallowell vs Megan Muller6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Ashmore-Guin / Nola Nelson vs Cory Dunnick / Annie Humphrey6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Jennifer Thomas vs Christy Jones / Heather Bacon6-4, 6-1
2022-06-20vs GTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesPatricia Curry / Jennifer Thomas vs Jeanne Cahn / Hanh Phi6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNancy Hallowell vs Kendra Krauss6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Angie Sanders vs Meredith Munro / Lisa Schilling4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLissa Moon / Mary Murray vs Regina Fontaine / Jessica Sanderson6-0, 6-0
2022-06-13vs DTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesAngie Shappell / Anne Brehmer vs Laura James / Susie Kokoska6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobin Ashmore-Guin vs Christine Chang6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKay Roesch / Mary Murray vs Carrie Weingart / Sharol Preisser6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Thomas / Patricia Curry vs Cynthia Mix / Janice Jensen6-3, 7-5
2022-06-11vs CACM GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngie Shappell / Anne Brehmer vs Kara Boulanger / NATALIE KOONTZ6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNancy Hallowell vs Kit Demko6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Kay Roesch vs Julie Bulatovic / Andrea Gordon6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Angie Sanders vs Kristen Corcoran / Stephanie Mcgowan3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Angie Shappell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Nancy Hallowell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Lissa Moon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Jennifer Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Kay Roesch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Nola Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Catherine Corbett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Robin Ashmore-Guin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Anne Brehmer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jo Anna Cline
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Curry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Corbett + Lissa Moon25164% games+4.1% vs expected
Patricia Curry + Jennifer Thomas4255% games+3.5% vs expected
Patricia Curry + Robin Ashmore-Guin2347% games+0.7% vs expected
Catherine Corbett + Kay Roesch5158% games−9.8% vs expected
Kay Roesch + Lissa Moon3245% games−15.6% vs expected
Anne Brehmer + Angie Shappell5061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Shappell
115W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
Nancy Hallowell
101W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lissa Moon
109W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jennifer Thomas
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Kay Roesch
102W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Nola Nelson
20W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Catherine Corbett
59W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Robin Ashmore-Guin
30W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Anne Brehmer
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jo Anna Cline
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Curry
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.