Teams

WP RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs DTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKate Anderson / Natalie Hirschfeld vs Susie Kokoska / Sharol Preisser6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Nancy Alterman7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnna Jones / Sissel Eckenhausen vs Cynthia Mix / Elaine Yang7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Fisher / Dananne Solomon vs Janice Jensen / Carrie Weingart1-6, 1-6
2022-07-13vs CACM BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesKristin Barry / Sarah Grimmer vs Lissa Moon / Catherine Corbett5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Nancy Hallowell2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Hirschfeld / Kate Anderson vs Angie Shappell / Anne Brehmer4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDenise Fisher / Anna Jones vs Mary Murray / Kay Roesch3-6, 5-7
2022-07-11vs CM GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristin Barry / Natalie Hirschfeld vs Shannon Burke / Kass Schwappach2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Loudis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Denise Fisher vs Kristen Daley / Carla Bartell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Angela Hedgepeth vs Terri Cohen / Stacy McHugh6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-27vs GTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKate Anderson / Kim Chen vs Jeanne Cahn / Katherine Demong6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLena Capra vs Catherine Calder6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Denise Fisher vs Meredith Munro / Christine Regis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Angela Hedgepeth vs Jessica Sanderson / Regina Fontaine7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs CACM GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesNatalie Hirschfeld / Denise Fisher vs Shelly Jones / NATALIE KOONTZ7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLena Capra vs Kit Demko3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKate Anderson / Kristin Loudis vs Stephanie Mcgowan / Julie Bulatovic5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Dananne Solomon vs Andrea Gordon / Barbara Chin0-6, 2-6
2022-06-13vs DTP GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesKristin Barry / Natalie Hirschfeld vs Smita Merchant / Mary Taylor6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLena Capra vs Kristin Janos6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKate Anderson / Kristin Loudis vs Jaylyn Bunning / Cynthia Smith6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Anna Jones vs Hallie Lombard / Joey Rothman7-6, 6-2
2022-06-06vs SKY BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesNatalie Hirschfeld / Kim Chen vs Betsy Barringer / Mimi Pomeranz6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLena Capra vs Megan Muller7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Barry / Kristin Loudis vs Karen Calle / Jane Gonnella7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Angela Hedgepeth vs Julie Bock / Heather Bacon6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Sarah Grimmer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Natalie Hirschfeld
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.69
Kim Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Denise Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Lena Capra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Kristin Barry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Kristin Loudis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.38
Dananne Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Sissel Eckenhausen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Angela Hedgepeth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Grimmer + Kristin Barry3445% games+2.5% vs expected
Kim Chen + Kristin Loudis2646% games−3.6% vs expected
Sissel Eckenhausen + Kristin Loudis2643% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Grimmer
23W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Natalie Hirschfeld
43W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Kim Chen
57W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Denise Fisher
23W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lena Capra
62W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kristin Barry
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Kristin Loudis
60W–84L career · 6 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Dananne Solomon
68W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Sissel Eckenhausen
51W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Angela Hedgepeth
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.