Teams

Mindich

2026 55&Over Men Metro · 9.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.33 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs Metro: LehmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Tomasini / Lee Nadler vs Ian Katz / Alex Zilberman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDanny Rosenthal / Reid Tratenberg vs Matthew Sirovich / Gregory Nero1-6, 3-6
2026-06-14vs Metro: LehmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanny Rosenthal / Matthew Corcoran vs Michael Grenert / Eli Stahl6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrendan MacDonnell / Andrew Kimball vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-07vs Metro: LehmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Corcoran / Jared Smith vs Isaac Osaki / Jeff Ravetz3-6, 2-6
2026-06-04vs Metro: LehmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Tomasini / Thomas Sheridan vs Vladi Tsipenyuk / Alex Zilberman2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRudolf van Mol / James Sadek vs Ian Katz / Sadik Sendich0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanny Rosenthal / Jared Smith vs Michael Grenert / Michael Jurick6-7, 5-7
2026-05-11vs Metro: LehmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesReid Tratenberg / Danny Rosenthal vs Sadik Sendich / Eli Stahl1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJames Sadek / Rudolf van Mol vs Jeff Ravetz / Michael Jurick6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-28vs Metro: LehmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Ozer / Peter Taub vs Chris Soulios / Vladi Tsipenyuk0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRudolf van Mol / Eric Tomasini vs Michael Grenert / Mark Weller2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Usher / Thomas Holz vs David Berenbaum / Alex Zilberman0-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs Metro: LehmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJonathan Holtz / Danny Rosenthal vs Ian Katz / Eli Stahl4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Kimball / Reid Tratenberg vs Lawrence Lehman / Isaac Osaki7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blake Spahn
published 5
4.40
Eric Tomasini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Dubin
published 4.5
4.06
Danny Rosenthal
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.90
Rudolf van Mol
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Peter Taub
published
Andrew Kimball
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Thomas Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Thomas Holz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
James Sadek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jared Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jeremy Mindich
published
Jonathan Holtz
published
Kevin Jenkins
published
Lee Nadler
published
Mark Ozer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Corcoran
published
Reid Tratenberg
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Usher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Sheridan + Brendan MacDonnell314 matchesnot enough data
Rudolf van Mol + James Sadek123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Holz + Peter Taub123 matchesnot enough data
Reid Tratenberg + Danny Rosenthal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blake Spahn
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Eric Tomasini
72W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Andrew Dubin
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Danny Rosenthal
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
Rudolf van Mol
327W–239L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Peter Taub
62W–31L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Andrew Kimball
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Brendan MacDonnell
41W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Thomas Sheridan
52W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Thomas Holz
56W–72L career · 8 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
James Sadek
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jared Smith
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeremy Mindich
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Holtz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Jenkins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Nadler
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Ozer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Corcoran
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Reid Tratenberg
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Usher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.