Teams

MC YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-01vs NJ MAROONLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulie Gall / Ursula Hamel vs Kira Moore / Danielle Murphy2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEllen Sprague vs Stephanie Shawn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Keating / Jill McKeon vs Holly Bristol / April DeLauro3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Coddington vs Courtney Gaudet6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErika Vincent / Dana Stehno vs Angela Hale / Debbie Lipski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-29vs HIW REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesMargaret Kuhn / Ursula Hamel vs Laurie Johnson / Palmira Miner4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEllen Sprague vs Daphne Taber6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Gall / Dana Stehno vs Doreen Evans / Susie Shipley4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMolly Balmes vs Laura Billups5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill McKeon / Kathleen Keating vs Katie Linkner / Reid Thompson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-25vs LPTC GREENLost 13
L#1 SinglesMolly Balmes vs Joan Clancy7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill McKeon / Kathleen Keating vs Gwen Riley / Linda Strauss3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDana Stehno vs Carissa Zook6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Hauschildt / Ursula Hamel vs Kimberly Barben / Susan Whatley4-6, 1-6
2023-05-11vs NJ GOLDLost 13
L#1 SinglesEllen Sprague vs Michelle Halliday4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Balmes / Margaret Kuhn vs Amanda Wintenburg / Cynthia Snavely5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmy Coddington vs Katie Phillips2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Hauschildt / Erika Vincent vs Natalie Cervera / Christy Carello6-3, 6-1
2023-05-04vs LTC-M GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMargaret Kuhn / Ursula Hamel vs April Kobayashi / Martha McNamara2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMolly Balmes vs Shana Fonte6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Coddington vs Jennifer Rogers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErika Vincent / Jill McKeon vs Linda Sexton / Ginny Laadt3-6, 5-7
2023-04-27vs NJ MAROONLost 12
W#1 SinglesEllen Sprague vs Holly Bristol6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesUrsula Hamel / Dana Stehno vs Angela Hale / Erin Manzolillo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Coddington / Kathleen Keating vs Courtney Gaudet / Danielle Murphy3-6, 1-6
2023-04-20vs LPTC GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesJill McKeon / Molly Balmes vs Gwen Riley / Linda Strauss4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEllen Sprague vs Joan Clancy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Gall / Ursula Hamel vs Lauren Anderson / Carole Lofing4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDana Stehno vs Carissa Zook6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Coddington / Kathleen Keating vs Kellie Bonthron / Susan Whatley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Ellen Sprague
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Molly Balmes
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Ursula Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Dana Stehno
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Amy Coddington
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Erika Vincent
published
3.06
Julie Gall
published
3.00
Margaret Kuhn
published
2.88
Patricia Shaw
published
2.63
Leslie Hauschildt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jill McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kathleen Keating
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Balmes + Margaret Kuhn3352% games+4.0% vs expected
Margaret Kuhn + Ursula Hamel2442% games+0.2% vs expected
Amy Coddington + Molly Balmes7453% games−5.3% vs expected
Julie Gall + Ursula Hamel2645% games−5.6% vs expected
Dana Stehno + Ursula Hamel5549% games−13.2% vs expected
Amy Coddington + Dana Stehno2345% gamesnot enough data
Amy Coddington + Margaret Kuhn134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Hauschildt + Ursula Hamel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellen Sprague
100W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Molly Balmes
76W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Ursula Hamel
94W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dana Stehno
28W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Amy Coddington
36W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Erika Vincent
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Julie Gall
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
3.06
Margaret Kuhn
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Patricia Shaw
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Leslie Hauschildt
45W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Jill McKeon
43W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.60
Kathleen Keating
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.