Teams

Reedy, Mark

2026 HOA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-14vs Thyagarajan, JagannathLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Warkentine / John Brown vs Michael Cox / Anthony Seim3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Zung vs Zachary Carroll2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRussell Packard / Chris Wilson vs Arjun Amaran / Ram Shankar6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Burgess, RandyWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Lunsford / William Zung vs Joel Fagin / Jeff Hargroves3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRussell Packard / Mark Reedy vs Andrew Leslie / Nick Wright5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-07vs Schwabauer, DougLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Turner / Russell Packard vs Thomas Verdi / Brad Cook3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Zung vs Bryan Gansen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Reedy / Kurt Davids vs Trevor Holsinger / Dan Nibberich2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Jacobs / David Harrison vs Nestor Gouttierre / Matt Moore4-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs Urban, RickWon 31
L#1 DoublesRussell Packard / Chris Turner vs Scott Bollinger / Dennis Cruise2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Zung vs David Caldwell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKurt Davids / Stephen Lunsford vs Nathan Gray / Kris Chatrathi6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJohn Brown / Bob Warkentine vs James Dawkins / Abiodun Akinwuntan6-4, 6-2
2026-02-14vs Smith, JohnWon 21
W#1 SinglesWilliam Zung vs Andy Kasselman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Wilson / Jeff Lamb vs Jeffrey Marcott / Joel Rook3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKurt Davids / Mark Reedy vs Blair Hinkle / C Raymond Lake6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-07vs Gerleman, GarrettWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Zung / Russell Packard vs Ricardo Bravo / Lucas Marionsini5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Warkentine / Jeff Lamb vs Aaron Pepkowitz / Garrett Gerleman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-31vs Pattabiraman, KarthickWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Turner / William Zung vs Luis Gonzalez Saiz / Jay Caple6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKurt Davids / Mark Reedy vs Paul Yaple / Erik Gasparovich6-1, 6-0
2026-01-17vs HOA/Stroede/40&over4.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Harrison / Mark Reedy vs Nate Arnold / Brendan Gore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRussell Packard / Chris Turner vs Thomas Ohnemus / Dave Moore1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Zung / Chris Wilson vs Duane Strader / Kevin Jackson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-28vs HOA/Stroede/40&over4.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Kirkpatrick / William Zung vs Shawn Perkins / Derrick Field2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBob Warkentine / Casey Lee vs Thomas Ohnemus / Ravi Peru2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
William Zung
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Brian Harris
published 4
Chris Turner
published 4
Chris Wilson
published 4
3.71
Russell Packard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Bob Warkentine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Kurt Davids
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
David Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.22
Walid Alfraihat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Lamb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Brown
published
Mark Reedy
published
Robert Jacobs
published
Stephen Lunsford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Davids + William Zung5066% games+10.0% vs expected
Russell Packard + Bob Warkentine4256% games+3.2% vs expected
Russell Packard + William Zung8258% games+3.1% vs expected
Russell Packard + Mark Reedy3548% games+0.7% vs expected
Kurt Davids + Russell Packard3355% gamesnot enough data
David Harrison + Walid Alfraihat4260% gamesnot enough data
Robert Jacobs + William Zung303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Reedy + Chris Wilson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Zung
72W–35L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Brian Harris
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Chris Turner
22W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Chris Wilson
13W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Russell Packard
44W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Bob Warkentine
62W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Kurt Davids
64W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
David Harrison
49W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Walid Alfraihat
21W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Jeff Lamb
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Reedy
13W–33L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Jacobs
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Lunsford
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.