Teams

Sioli (Ron Ehmann)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jill Hidalgo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.85
Michelle Dalmau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Marianne Sioli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Jill Balli
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.73
Silvia Amat
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.71
3.69
Tracey Kealy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Maria Jose Jorquera
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.60
Sandra Batalla
published
3.59
Damarys Vega
published 4
3.52
Veronique Mcelvein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Eunice McCann
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Lann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Renate Krause
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvia Amat + Maria Jose Jorquera121352% games+1.7% vs expected
Jill Balli + Jill Hidalgo191553% games+0.5% vs expected
Veronique Mcelvein + Sandra Batalla41244% games+0.4% vs expected
Jill Balli + Michelle Dalmau272552% games−3.0% vs expected
Jill Hidalgo + Michelle Dalmau7748% games−6.9% vs expected
Silvia Amat + Linda Lann51543% games−11.8% vs expected
Jill Balli + Marianne Sioli3740% gamesnot enough data
Marianne Sioli + Michelle Dalmau3745% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Hidalgo
212W–132L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Michelle Dalmau
220W–155L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Marianne Sioli
91W–84L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jill Balli
161W–144L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Silvia Amat
63W–85L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Carolyn Seckinger
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Tracey Kealy
71W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Maria Jose Jorquera
146W–116L career · 15 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
Sandra Batalla
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Damarys Vega
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Veronique Mcelvein
56W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Eunice McCann
178W–120L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Linda Lann
57W–144L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Renate Krause
49W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.