Teams

BC-MCC/JulieAustin

2022 TRI LEVEL MIXED SPRING - BC Local League · BC - TRI LEVEL MIXED Spring 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJesse Givich / Siobhan Carroll vs Brandon Kraines / Alexandra Pijuan4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJesse Givich / Tracy Jones vs Brandon Kraines / Aileen Kizlinski6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesBrent Buchsbaum / Heather Krueger vs Jonathan Martinez / Shubha Chick3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Bruksch / Paul Reiner vs Samantha Kadera / Steven Anderson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJesse Givich / Jen Hall vs Bruno Gasparetti / Alexandra Pijuan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarry Ryan / Bre Kelleher vs Alexandra Pijuan / Brandon Kraines6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesEric Knudson / Heather Krueger vs Jonathan Martinez / Karina Kraines2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMonika Kiznis / Jesse Givich vs Bruno Gasparetti / Alexandra Pijuan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJesse Givich / Jen Hall vs Alexandra Pijuan / Matthew Luce4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - TRI LEVEL MIXED Spring 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Brent Buchsbaum
published 4.5
4.20
Heather Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Bre Kelleher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Tony Rojko
published
3.79
Monika Kiznis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
3.69
Lauren Bruksch
published
3.64
3.64
Paul Reiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Dean DeVore
published 4
3.60
Layla Kiffin
published
3.55
Jesse Givich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Siobhan Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Frankie Read
published 3.5
John J Cochran
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brent Buchsbaum
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Heather Krueger
23W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Bre Kelleher
67W–43L career · 1 line in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Tony Rojko
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.79
4
Monika Kiznis
101W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Anne Marie Leonard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Lauren Bruksch
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Aimee Gallego-Cochran
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Paul Reiner
93W–90L career · 1 line in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Dean DeVore
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Layla Kiffin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jesse Givich
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Siobhan Carroll
62W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Frankie Read
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John J Cochran
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.