Teams

BC-LLW-HermosaBeachPier/JonathanMartinez

2022 TRI LEVEL MIXED SPRING - BC Local League · BC - TRI LEVEL MIXED Spring 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-12vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Kadera / Arsen Harutyunyan vs Anne Marie Leonard / Tony Rojko6-2, 6-4
2022-06-03vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Kadera / Arash Panah vs Frankie Read / Dean DeVore6-3, 6-1
2022-05-13vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrandon Kraines / Aileen Kizlinski vs Jesse Givich / Tracy Jones4-6, 4-6
2022-05-06vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Kadera / Steven Anderson vs Lauren Bruksch / Paul Reiner6-4, 6-1
2022-04-22vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Kadera / Steven Anderson vs Layla Kiffin / Tony Rojko6-2, 6-3
2022-04-08vs BC-MCC/JulieAustinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Kadera / Arsen Harutyunyan vs Frankie Read / Dean DeVore6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - TRI LEVEL MIXED Spring 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Karina Kraines
published
4.18
Samantha Kadera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Drisa Carrizo
published 4.5
3.99
Steven Anderson
published
3.74
3.65
Shubha Chick
published
3.62
Aileen Kizlinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Matthew Luce
published
3.24
Sarah Musgrove
published
3.20
Bruno Gasparetti
published 3.5
Scott Anastasi
published
Stephen Testa
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karina Kraines
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Samantha Kadera
39W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Drisa Carrizo
23W–23L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
Steven Anderson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Arsen Harutyunyan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Shubha Chick
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Aileen Kizlinski
55W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Matthew Luce
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Sarah Musgrove
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Bruno Gasparetti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Scott Anastasi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Testa
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.