Teams

Camden

2024 Virginia Beach Combo · Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-22vs Kulas - Serve AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Camden / Rebecca Newton vs Elizabeth Peterson / Stephanie Bowen3-6, 4-6
2024-11-13vs CaskillWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Rebecca Newton vs Grayson Kellam / Angelica Suciu7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Willett / Erin James vs Courtney Kellam / Ashley Holmes7-5, 6-3
2024-10-23vs CaskillWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Willett / Becky Gordon vs Courtney Kellam / Angelica Suciu6-0, 6-2
2024-10-02vs CaskillLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Camden / Erin James vs Gail Moyer / Angelica Suciu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Willett / Cara Anthony vs Shannon Halter / Stephanie Caskill2-6, 3-6
2024-09-20vs Kulas - Serve AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesTammy Willett / Cara Anthony vs Emery O'Connor / Amy Lehmkuhler6-1, 6-0
2024-09-11vs CaskillLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Camden / Erin James vs Sandra Savino / Melissa Johnson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Katie LeGrande
published
3.44
Tammy Willett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Megan Farr
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Rebecca Newton
published
2.97
Shannon Dupre
published
2.92
Kimberly Cummings
published
2.86
Andrea Keller
published 3
2.84
Erin James
published 3
2.65
Cara Anthony
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Cummings + Erin James6261% games+5.9% vs expected
Tammy Willett + Erin Camden251354% games+0.8% vs expected
Tammy Willett + Megan Farr314 matchesnot enough data
Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Cummings + Cara Anthony123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie LeGrande
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tammy Willett
136W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Rebecca Newton
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Shannon Dupre
31W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kimberly Cummings
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Andrea Keller
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Erin James
15W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Cara Anthony
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.