Teams

Leeward Walk (Jane Baginski)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-01-15vs Foxdale (Michelle Nesser)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesJoAnn Houck / Andrea Keeble vs Georgia Caras / Toddi Blythe6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmey Rishel vs Brittney Neser2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJane Baginski / Emma Baginski vs Mary Lynn Fleck / Analy Hernandez4-6, 6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Kelly / Pam Klee vs Michelle Titolo / Karen Chang6-3, 6-1
L#4 DoublesKelly Marsho / Jennifer Hayes vs Diane Mathews / Lori Hennessey2-6, 3-6
2025-01-04vs Mill Creek HS (Leslie Hooper)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJoAnn Houck / Pam Klee vs Jennifer Bombulie / Madison Shewbert2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJane Baginski / Andrea Thompson vs Leslie Hooper / Kyoko Kirsch2-6, 6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hayes / Lori Kelly vs Gemma Cerdan / Karen Zaro3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesAnita Lundkovsky / Kelly Marsho vs Jennifer Norris / Anne Rowe6-3, 1-6, 3-6
2024-12-14vs Wild Timber (Ann Olps)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Baginski / Angela Gaddy vs Ann Olps / Annette Snipes4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Thompson vs Deedee Miller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Keeble / Jennifer Hayes vs Elaine Doherty / Lindsey Davis3-6, 1-6
2024-12-07vs Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJoAnn Houck / Leanne Edison vs Heather Bray / Jennifer Hall6-7, 6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEmma Baginski vs Linda Chang7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPam Klee / Andrea Keeble vs Elle Race / Julia Stephen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmey Rishel / Karen Kaplan vs Sandi Dickson / Bridget van Dyke0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesLori Kelly / Kelly Marsho vs Tiffany Coyle / Kim Erickson6-4, 2-6, 0-6
2024-11-23vs Laurel Springs (Sarah Quatela)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesLeanne Edison / JoAnn Houck vs Ashley Hawkes / Amy Quinn6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmma Baginski vs Kristen Barinowski7-6, 5-7, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPam Klee / Angela Gaddy vs Susan Fendt / Erin Hoover3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Keeble / Jane Baginski vs Sarah Quatela / Soomy Sim3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAmey Rishel / Lori Kelly vs Donna Clark / Wendy Haymond2-6, 1-6
2024-11-16vs Seven Oaks (Christine Caraibot)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesLeanne Edison / Pam Klee vs Preethi Rosslow / Jennifer Austin5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmma Baginski vs Deepali Raghuwanshi6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Thompson / Jane Baginski vs Andrea Bixler / Sunila Deshpande3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hayes / Andrea Keeble vs Jolie Steppe / Karenjit Mayer2-6, 7-5, 6-4
L#4 DoublesKaren Kaplan / Anita Lundkovsky vs Clare Delmastro / Shannon Grice2-6, 1-6
2024-11-09vs Deerlake (Angela Morgan)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJoAnn Houck / Leanne Edison vs Julie Johnson / Ann Cha6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJane Baginski vs Vanessa Mattesich3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmma Baginski / Andrea Thompson vs Ashley Nguyen / Sara Zywicki6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPam Klee / Karen Kaplan vs Angela Morgan / Allie Morgan4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesKelly Marsho / Amey Rishel vs Candice Dobra / Kaya Dopfer3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Leanne Edison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emma Baginski
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Andrea Keeble
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Lauren Brougher
published
3.66
Pam Klee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
JoAnn Houck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Jane Baginski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.49
Andrea Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.45
Lori Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Kelly Marsho
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Anita Lundkovsky
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Karen Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Amey Rishel
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Angela Gaddy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Brougher + Leanne Edison5256% games+4.7% vs expected
JoAnn Houck + Leanne Edison4256% games+2.5% vs expected
Pam Klee + Jane Baginski3249% games−7.9% vs expected
Jane Baginski + Lori Kelly2349% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Brougher + JoAnn Houck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leanne Edison
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Emma Baginski
11W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andrea Keeble
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Lauren Brougher
31W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Pam Klee
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
JoAnn Houck
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Jane Baginski
12W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Andrea Thompson
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lori Kelly
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Kelly Marsho
0W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.32
3.5
Anita Lundkovsky
5W–18L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Kaplan
36W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amey Rishel
4W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Angela Gaddy
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Hayes
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.