Teams

LAC

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-07vs RCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesJenna Marvin / Tiffany Hall vs Emily Pedersen / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKim Grogan vs Ginger Phillips1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBobbi Billings / Joyce Kelly vs Victoria Tait / Christine LaBerge3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTina Gray / Susan Crandall vs Denise Belk / Katie Johnstone2-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs LVTASplit 22
L#1 DoublesShellie Hall / Jenna Marvin vs Kelsey Keene / Emily Sieg4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSara Palmer vs Kelly Blanks6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoyce Kelly / Bobbi Billings vs Sarah Lodewick / Rebecca Moritz6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesOrit Ostrowiak / Lynn Schulte vs Amanda Repert / Trudy Samuelson6-4, 6-1
2026-06-29vs HMTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesShellie Hall / Jenna Marvin vs Jennifer Wiley / Kaili Young4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKim Grogan vs Carolina Moore6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Schulte / Bobbi Billings vs Gail Draper / Tara Kim4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Kelly / Sara Palmer vs Amy Berkner / Karen Wright3-6, 4-6
2026-06-23vs HMTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesLynn Schulte / Joyce Kelly vs Carmen Kilday / Kimberly Tomlinson5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSara Palmer vs Jennifer Wiley3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLourdes Buck / Justine Barone vs Suzanne Hale / Mitzi Johnson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Gray / Susan Crandall vs Karen Wright / Gail Draper4-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs MEA TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesLynn Schulte / Orit Ostrowiak vs Tracy Diamond / Holly Brown1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Palmer vs Thanyanat LeBlang6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShellie Hall / Tiffany Hall vs Jana Krutsinger / Sue McGee6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLourdes Buck / Justine Barone vs Christie Deluca / Monika Thon1-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs RCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesLourdes Buck / Tiffany Hall vs Manuela Dos Santos / Katie Johnstone2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSara Palmer vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShellie Hall / Jenna Marvin vs Emily Pedersen / Emily Paulson1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJustine Barone / Kim Grogan vs Chelsea Crowell / Joy Herrin1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HMTC3315921195
2LVTA33121227201
3PCC TEAL33101431247
4LAC3391532213
5JCC BLUE16141435272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Shellie Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.37
Orit Ostrowiak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Bobbi Billings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Lynn Schulte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.14
Jenna Marvin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Sara Palmer
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.95
Kim Grogan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Lourdes Buck
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Tiffany Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Susan Crandall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Justine Barone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Joyce Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Tina Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shellie Hall + Jenna Marvin281953% games−0.6% vs expected
Tiffany Hall + Shellie Hall224 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Billings + Lynn Schulte314 matchesnot enough data
Bobbi Billings + Joyce Kelly044 matchesnot enough data
Orit Ostrowiak + Lynn Schulte404 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Hall + Lourdes Buck123 matchesnot enough data
Jenna Marvin + Orit Ostrowiak303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shellie Hall
63W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Orit Ostrowiak
80W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Bobbi Billings
51W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Lynn Schulte
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Jenna Marvin
54W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
Sara Palmer
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
Kim Grogan
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.95
Lourdes Buck
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90
Tiffany Hall
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90
Susan Crandall
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.89
4
Justine Barone
91W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Joyce Kelly
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.70
Tina Gray
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.