Teams

PCC TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-14vs RRTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Damico Anderson / Lynsey Adragna vs Dorothy Ripka / Deborah Weis4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDiem Phan-Boyer vs Kimberly Allen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShawna Walker / Midi Daddis vs Kelly Hardy / Susan Duffy6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristine Barrett / Karina Stevens vs Judy Kennelley / Kelly Cohen5-7, 4-6
2026-06-30vs GAC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesShawna Walker / Midi Daddis vs Leslie Mease / Anna Reed7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Corrado vs Laura Theiss7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Doyle / Lisa Damico Anderson vs Katie Deline / Maribeth Hanzlik6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Bluemel / Lucy Carson vs Juliet Beckman / Elizabeth Barnacle6-1, 6-1
2026-06-23vs LTFC NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShawna Walker / Lucy Carson vs Judy Flaherty / Bethany Pribila6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKarina Stevens vs Shirley Stange2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Corrado / Karen Bluemel vs Ankie Richard / Karen Ross5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVicky Mediate / Lynsey Adragna vs Kimberly Davis / Sarah Marr6-3, 7-6
2026-06-16vs RRTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Corrado / Kristine Barrett vs Kelly Cohen / Amanda Wootton6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDiem Phan-Boyer vs Kimberly Allen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVicky Mediate / Karina Stevens vs Amanda Iapalucci / Deborah Weis4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesShawna Walker / Midi Daddis vs Judy Kennelley / Michele Cunningham6-3, 7-6
2026-06-09vs GAC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesMidi Daddis / Shawna Walker vs Chelsea Ye / Michelle McDonough6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDiem Phan-Boyer vs Laura Theiss6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristine Barrett / Shannon Doyle vs Katie Deline / Maribeth Hanzlik2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVicky Mediate / Lynsey Adragna vs Juliet Beckman / Julie Wilson6-4, 6-3
2026-06-02vs LTFC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesShawna Walker / Midi Daddis vs Kimberly Davis / Deborah Jones6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKarina Stevens vs Shirley Stange4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesVicky Mediate / Kristine Barrett vs Karen Ross / Rebecca Martin3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynsey Adragna / Lucy Carson vs Ankie Richard / Moira Smith4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HMTC3315921195
2LVTA33121227201
3PCC TEAL33101431247
4LAC3391532213
5JCC BLUE16141435272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Elizabeth Corrado
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.26
Midi Daddis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Shawna Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.20
Kristine Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Lucy Carson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.15
Karen Bluemel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Diem Phan-Boyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Karina Stevens
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Lisa Damico Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Vicky Mediate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Lynsey Adragna
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Shannon Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawna Walker + Midi Daddis3252% games−2.8% vs expected
Vicky Mediate + Kristine Barrett2342% games−12.1% vs expected
Lisa Damico Anderson + Midi Daddis033 matchesnot enough data
Shawna Walker + Vicky Mediate033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Corrado
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Midi Daddis
56W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
Shawna Walker
35W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Kristine Barrett
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Lucy Carson
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Karen Bluemel
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Diem Phan-Boyer
39W–92L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Karina Stevens
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Lisa Damico Anderson
39W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
Vicky Mediate
4W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Lynsey Adragna
53W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
Shannon Doyle
4W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.