Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Woodbury

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W PM

18 players · average NTRP 4.43 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-07Won 20
W#2 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Michelle Moscon / Amy Davis6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKarina Herman / Susan Ellison vs Shanda Stoner / Jana Fairbanks6-0, 7-5
2021-05-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Susan Ellison vs Patrice Duvernay / Amy Woolley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-10vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-UtgaardWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Michelle Jaskierny vs Renee Utgaard / Miglena Aaron6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Ellison / Laura Bailey vs Teri Bishop / Misty Morrow6-1, 6-2
2021-05-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Moody / Susan Ellison vs Lisa Mayberry / Angela Kelson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2021-05-03vs Sports Mall-Widerburg/VietorWon 20
W#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Heidi Gordon / Alexandria Keith6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Michelle Jaskierny vs Pam Ollivier / Katy Alder6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Sarah Blake / Kimberly Carroll5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Julie Winterton
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 4.5
Gretchen Knell
published 4.5
4.21
Paige Miller
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
4.15
Karina Herman
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.09
Meghan Clark
usually #2 Singles 73%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
4.09
Jen Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.07
Marianne Squires
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Ann Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Tracy Derby
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.62
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Debbie Moody
published
Janine Nesseth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Leslie Barrowes
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Jaskierny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rochelle Obrien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Maxfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane McQuade + Paige Miller7160% games+8.6% vs expected
Rochelle Obrien + Jen Dickey6650% games+2.6% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Ann Phillips584453% games−0.4% vs expected
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Leslie Barrowes2439% games−0.9% vs expected
Paige Miller + Jen Dickey9655% games−2.3% vs expected
Karina Herman + Leslie Barrowes151948% games−2.4% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury10749% games−4.4% vs expected
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Janine Nesseth3345% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Julie Winterton
176W–29L career · 11 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Gretchen Knell
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paige Miller
82W–23L career · 10 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
Karina Herman
73W–68L career · 8 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Jane McQuade
267W–181L career · 7 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
Meghan Clark
57W–55L career · 11 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jen Dickey
97W–70L career · 8 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Marianne Squires
47W–49L career · 7 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Ann Phillips
78W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
Tracy Derby
71W–55L career · 7 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
78W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
Debbie Moody
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janine Nesseth
29W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leslie Barrowes
31W–64L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Jaskierny
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rochelle Obrien
48W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Maxfield
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ellison
31W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.