Teams

LAJONES/PEN

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs LKNorcross-Sheheen/TrumpSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGretchen Kohlhepp / Ming Keadle vs Stephanie Schaeper / Michelle Noglows6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTracie Persinger vs Caroline Ray2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garcia / Sharon Cantey vs Keri Norcross / Dawn Aldrich3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLiz Miller / Kira Skill vs Renee Sica / Jill Hulse-Mack6-0, 6-2
2022-04-15vs LEHO-Holum/LNTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGretchen Kohlhepp / Nancy Zylstra vs Annie Edenfield / Stephanie Clancy6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKira Skill / Tracie Persinger vs Barbara Kosior / Filomena Ferri2-6, 3-6
2022-04-08vs LKRobbins/RRLost 02
L#1 DoublesMing Keadle / Nancy Zylstra vs Sachi Denny / Janet Szilagyi2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTracie Persinger vs Kathleen Navola4-6, 4-6
2022-04-01vs LABrandon/LNTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Cantey / Linda Dagit vs Laurie Cleveland / Lisa van Arnam4-6, 2-6
2022-03-18vs LJTeifer/JettonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garcia / Kira Skill vs Elizabeth Foreman / Julie Mudge4-6, 5-7
2022-03-11vs LABonham/LNTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Cantey / Linda Dagit vs Leah Russell / Darlene Scripter6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMing Keadle vs Anna Bonham6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Zylstra / Louise Brown vs Noreen Soos / Cyndi Poell6-2, 6-3
2022-03-04vs LTDudan/CSDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusanna Wagner / Nancy Zylstra vs Traci Dudan / Mary Ann Bradham4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Cantey / Jennifer Garcia vs Naila Campbell / Brenda Martinez6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Erin Hallman
published 4
3.79
Ming Keadle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kira Skill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Antoinette Jones
published 3.5
3.56
Tracie Persinger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Nancy Zylstra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Keryn Rush
published
3.12
Tracy Podesta
published
3.06
Sharon Cantey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Louise Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kira Skill + Antoinette Jones2351% games+2.2% vs expected
Kira Skill + Nancy Zylstra111150% games−0.2% vs expected
Kira Skill + Tracie Persinger4450% gamesnot enough data
Kira Skill + Sharon Cantey2351% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Zylstra + Ming Keadle224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Cantey + Tracie Persinger134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Zylstra + Tracie Persinger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Hallman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Ming Keadle
110W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Gretchen Kohlhepp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kira Skill
156W–160L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Antoinette Jones
33W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Tracie Persinger
84W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Nancy Zylstra
76W–139L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Keryn Rush
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Tracy Podesta
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Sharon Cantey
31W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Louise Brown
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.