Teams

LKNorcross-Sheheen/Trump

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs LAJONES/PENWon 21
W#1 SinglesCaroline Ray vs Tracie Persinger6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeri Norcross / Dawn Aldrich vs Jennifer Garcia / Sharon Cantey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Sica / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Liz Miller / Kira Skill0-6, 2-6
2022-04-15vs LJTeifer/JettonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Julie Mudge / Donna Upchurch3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKatrina Childers vs Paige Mcguirk6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Renee Sica vs Jennifer Joiner / Wendy Evans2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKeri Norcross / Lisa Schacher vs Jodi Patterson / Elizabeth Foreman6-4, 7-5
2022-04-08vs LEHO-Holum/LNTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Ray / Michelle Noglows vs Karen Hallman / Mary Beth Thomas3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKeri Norcross / Lisa Schacher vs Erika Buchholz / SHARON WELLS6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-01vs LABonham/LNTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesJill Hulse-Mack / MaryGwen Murash vs Cyndi Poell / Kathy Dunlap6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCaroline Ray vs Kristine Bienstock6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Schacher / Katrina Childers vs Sherry Lerme / Robbin Turner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Aldrich / Keri Norcross vs Sarah Norton / Anna Bonham6-3, 6-2
2022-03-18vs LKRobbins/RRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Noglows / Lisa Schacher vs Mary Kennedy / Sharon Kerns2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Ray / Stephanie Schaeper vs Patricia Sharawy / Christina Tarry6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-11vs LTDudan/CSDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Ray / Stephanie Schaeper vs Ann Hughes / Barbara Moore6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Gandy / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Debbie Beam / Karen Ray6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-04vs LABrandon/LNTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Schaeper / Katrina Childers vs Leslie Gimbel / Elizabeth Kaufman3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Ray vs Lisa Dunn3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Freeman / MaryGwen Murash vs Nancy Thompson / Amy Brandon2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Lisa Schacher vs Stacie Kennington / Susan Lunsford1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Carol Freeman
published 4
3.68
Caroline Ray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Stephanie Schaeper
published
3.44
Katrina Childers
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Keri Norcross
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.29
Dawn Aldrich
published 3.5
3.25
Amy Gandy
published 3.5
3.21
Jill Hulse-Mack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Lisa Schacher
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Sheheen
published
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Renee Sica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Sheheen + Jennifer Plaster2343% games+3.7% vs expected
Lisa Schacher + Katrina Childers351955% games+2.0% vs expected
Caroline Ray + Katrina Childers15267% games+1.4% vs expected
Amy Gandy + Katrina Childers3548% games+0.1% vs expected
Lisa Schacher + Keri Norcross281553% games−0.6% vs expected
Caroline Ray + Keri Norcross14655% games−4.7% vs expected
MaryGwen Murash + Keri Norcross4457% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Plaster + MaryGwen Murash4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Freeman
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Caroline Ray
171W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Stephanie Schaeper
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Katrina Childers
158W–96L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
4
Keri Norcross
204W–139L career · 10 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Dawn Aldrich
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amy Gandy
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jill Hulse-Mack
70W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Lisa Schacher
177W–138L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly Sheheen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Renee Sica
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.