Teams

EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-14vs DAVIE STADIUM 18AW3.0CWon 31
L#1 DoublesJessica Jang / Peyton Mason vs Angela Heath / Kali Williams1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGrace Hu vs Molly Stern6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Soto / Jodi Munson vs Cora Luber / Soroya Wood6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesXuan Nguyen / Sandy Yip vs Rosalyn Evans / Eve Stewart6-2, 6-1
2025-06-08vs DAVIE STADIUM 18AW3.0CSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Alden / Jodi Munson vs Lily Gilels / M Bell4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Yip / Xuan Nguyen vs Angela Heath / Charlotte Niel7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGrace Hu vs Rachel Vyda-Venning6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPeyton Mason / Ziyue Zhang vs Anita Dayton / Jennifer Shim6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Julie Askins
published
3.00
Jodi Munson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Lan Wang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.92
Jihye Kim
published
2.91
Lisa Alden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sandy Yip
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
KAREN HOANG
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Peyton Mason
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.48
Wenfei Du
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.37
Avery Kim
published 2.5
Grace Hu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jessica Jang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tenzin Tsering
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ziyue Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Askins
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
Jodi Munson
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Lan Wang
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jihye Kim
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lisa Alden
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Sandy Yip
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
KAREN HOANG
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Peyton Mason
13W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Wenfei Du
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Avery Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Grace Hu
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Jang
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tenzin Tsering
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ziyue Zhang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.