Teams

DAVIE STADIUM 18AW3.0C

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesAngela Heath / Kali Williams vs Jessica Jang / Peyton Mason6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Stern vs Grace Hu1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCora Luber / Soroya Wood vs Andrea Soto / Jodi Munson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Addicott vs Uyanga Byambaa3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRosalyn Evans / Eve Stewart vs Xuan Nguyen / Sandy Yip2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesLily Gilels / M Bell vs Lisa Alden / Jodi Munson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMinjon Hall vs Uyanga Byambaa5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Heath / Charlotte Niel vs Sandy Yip / Xuan Nguyen6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRachel Vyda-Venning vs Grace Hu3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Dayton / Jennifer Shim vs Peyton Mason / Ziyue Zhang7-6, 6-3
2025-05-18vs DAVIE STADIUM 18AW3.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Foisy / Sam Page vs April Cruz / Sharon Lebenkoff6-3, 7-5
2025-04-19vs BERKELEY TC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Foisy / Anita Dayton vs Jill Foley / Michelle Marshank4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Lily Gilels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
M Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Minjon Hall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Lauren Addicott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.83
2.81
Lisa Foisy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Lana Rak
published 3
2.77
Molly Stern
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Kali Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Wendy Haworth
published
2.69
Angela Heath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Cora Luber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Charlotte Niel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Anita Dayton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Rachel Vyda-Venning
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.53
Eve Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Rosalyn Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Soroya Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Kelsey Wilkins
published
2.22
May Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minjon Hall + Lauren Addicott5065% games+1.9% vs expected
Angela Heath + Charlotte Niel134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Foisy + Eve Stewart033 matchesnot enough data
Eve Stewart + Molly Stern213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lily Gilels
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
M Bell
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Minjon Hall
34W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Lauren Addicott
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Caitlin Prendiville
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Lisa Foisy
72W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Lana Rak
57W–46L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Molly Stern
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Kali Williams
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Wendy Haworth
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Angela Heath
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Charlotte Niel
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Anita Dayton
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Rachel Vyda-Venning
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Eve Stewart
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Rosalyn Evans
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Soroya Wood
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Kelsey Wilkins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
May Lee
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.