← Teams

N OR-PTC-Wellman

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Ann Arp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Michelle Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Allison Crisp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Bennett-Hanes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Teufelin Traylen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-24Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Kristin Campbell / Sarah Grewe6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Jeanette Thomas vs Sara Weinstein / Amy Thomas6-2, 6-2
2024-11-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAnn Arp / Teufelin Traylen vs Jayne Mitchell / Amy Patton6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick vs Kristi Tompkins / Rita DeWeese7-6, 6-1
2024-11-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Miriam Habafy vs Nancy Atkins / Mary Jesse6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick vs Bernadette Lisac / Sandra Ellis6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Beth Kempton / Kathy Briscoe6-2, 6-0
2024-11-02Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Teufelin Traylen vs Ann Davidson / Joann Donahue6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Shawn Sefchick vs Wendy Simons / Rita DeWeese6-1, 6-1
2024-10-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Jeanette Thomas vs Jennifer Trank / Donna Feuerherdt7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Arp / Kaie Wellman vs Kristen Fisher / Victoria Cartwright6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Michelle Johnson vs Lucila Griesser / Cathy Valentine6-4, 7-6
2024-10-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAnn Arp / Shawn Sefchick vs Nancy Atkins / Jeny Joseph6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Gina Ariosa / Ann Cassin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Sharon Reese / Joanne Maginnis6-1, 6-0
2024-10-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Michelle Johnson vs Christine Taylor / Karen Groenweghe6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Crisp / Teufelin Traylen vs Tara Guimont / Carole Bell6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKaie Wellman / Ann Arp vs Sandy Rousseau / Marlene Enos7-5, 6-0
2024-09-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Michelle Johnson vs Colleen Kellogg / Candy Dann6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Michelle Robbins / Sheryl Riley6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Ann Arp
39W–27L career
0%80%20%
3.47
3.5
Michelle Johnson
82W–103L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Allison Crisp
34W–39L career
0%93%7%
3.38
3.5
Christine Bennett-Hanes
84W–61L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
14%86%0%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.