Teams

Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeah Oliver / Maria Hasbany vs Christina Lafferty / Hayley Hill7-5, 6-1
2025-10-03vs High Point/Soldan W4.0FSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLola Lott / Maria Hasbany vs Sue Lopez de Correia / Andrea Gonzalez6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJen Mulhern / Brenda Talavera vs Gina Paterno Villalobos / Joann Burke4-6, 2-6
2025-09-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLeigh Breunig vs Erin Schreyer1-6, 6-7
2025-09-19vs The Lakes TA/Buckalew-Criswell W4.0FSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Leah Oliver vs Julia Duong / Susan Quill7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Neilson / Rochelle Watson vs Erika Meade / April Parker6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-12vs Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Neilson / Kasey Colvin vs Patricia Arvanitis / Ha Tran1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLeigh Breunig vs Olivia Behne6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-05vs North Texas RC/Ross-Weber W4.0FWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Jen Mulhern vs Karen Newby / Sonja Bocklage6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Meg Lohr
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.90
Shannon Hogan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Erin Lange
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #3 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
3.81
Jen Mulhern
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.78
Maria Hasbany
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Lola Lott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Kasey Colvin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Louise Bexley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
Tricia Roos
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.58
Devon Bowling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Leah Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Leigh Breunig
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.50
Brenda Talavera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Karen Saland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Tina Kimbell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Heather Neilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Hasbany + Lola Lott6064% games+3.4% vs expected
Tricia Roos + Louise Bexley7557% games+2.1% vs expected
Erin Lange + Tricia Roos5253% games+1.0% vs expected
Kasey Colvin + Jen Mulhern2355% gamesnot enough data
Maria Hasbany + Leah Oliver303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Lohr + Tricia Roos303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Lohr + Louise Bexley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Lohr
35W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.01
Shannon Hogan
16W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Erin Lange
47W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Rochelle Watson
32W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Jen Mulhern
17W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Maria Hasbany
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Lola Lott
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Kasey Colvin
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Louise Bexley
21W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Tricia Roos
19W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Devon Bowling
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.58
Leah Oliver
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Leigh Breunig
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Brenda Talavera
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Karen Saland
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tina Kimbell
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Heather Neilson
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.