Teams

The Lakes TA/Buckalew-Criswell W4.0F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-17vs SMU/Park W4.0FLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Buckalew / Teri Doyle vs Abby McMullen / Robin Stone6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesErika Meade / Julie Hoang vs Ha Tran / Jamie Debusk-Loop1-6, 1-6
2025-09-19vs Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0FSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulia Duong / Susan Quill vs Maria Hasbany / Leah Oliver5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErika Meade / April Parker vs Heather Neilson / Rochelle Watson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesRosalyn Luong / Karen Buckalew vs Maria Galicia / Lisandra Romero6-1, 6-2
2025-09-05vs High Point/Soldan W4.0FLost 02
L#1 DoublesKate Chalupa / Julia Duong vs Jannine Soldan / Maria Caldwell4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Doyle / Michelle Buchanan vs Taryn Ziehm / Theresa Batoon3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Newberg-Schonwald W4.0F61181028219
2Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0F5116816185
3High Point/Soldan W4.0F4215921215
4SMU/Park W4.0F42121228226
5Jack Coleman/Smith-Bradley W4.0F42111329215
6DAC/Fellman W4.0F43181025237
7McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.0F43151329247
8The Lakes TA/Buckalew-Criswell W4.0F33101430210
9Gleneagles/Wright-Shukis W4.0F34151330248
10Stonebriar CC/Woodson W4.0F2491532238
11High Point/Neal-Jenkins W4.0F2591939281
12DCC/Chilian W4.0F1571735245
13North Texas RC/Ross-Weber W4.0F1571735252
14Rockwall GAC/Hill W4.0F0671740265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Wollitz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Christie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.80
April Parker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.78
Julie Hoang
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Sanella Wertz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Rosalyn Luong
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.66
Karen Buckalew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Ryane Criswell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Teri Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Julia Duong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Heather Helsel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Michelle Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Erika Meade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jessica Thota
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Kate Chalupa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marge Goodman
published
Susan Quill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Wollitz + Christie Smith6750% games+9.1% vs expected
Sanella Wertz + Jessica Thota4448% gamesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julia Duong2344% gamesnot enough data
Erika Meade + Julie Hoang4151% gamesnot enough data
Ryane Criswell + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Teri Doyle + Michelle Buchanan314 matchesnot enough data
Teri Doyle + Karen Buckalew044 matchesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Wollitz
35W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4.5
Christie Smith
30W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
April Parker
22W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Julie Hoang
55W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Sanella Wertz
17W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Rosalyn Luong
30W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
Karen Buckalew
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
Ryane Criswell
30W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Teri Doyle
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Julia Duong
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Heather Helsel
7W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
Michelle Buchanan
25W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Erika Meade
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jessica Thota
22W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Chalupa
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marge Goodman
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Quill
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.