Teams

Pelican Marsh - Barger

2023 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Chrissy Rogers4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMacKenzie Rickman / Brenda Rhoda vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Nicki Sebold6-7, 0-6
2022-12-05vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Samantha Kennedy vs Cheryl Toth / Lisa Gosney6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Jae Marie Fry6-4, 6-3
2022-11-28vs Riverstone - A MalletteWon 30
W#2 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Amanda Mallette / Carrie Stowell7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJulie Mans vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / MacKenzie Rickman vs Karen Hole / Macey Tyll6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-14vs Pelican Bay Park - FlegelSplit 11
W#2 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Lauren Keillor vs Gwendolyn Messonnier / Michele Nelson-Baker3-6, 2-6
2022-11-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Harbert / Karyn Sardar vs Cheryl Toth / Melanie McLean5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Karey Hogan vs Gina Adiutori / Sara Munholland6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Chrissy Rogers3-6, 4-6
2022-10-24vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 12
W#2 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Bernadette DiPino / Marzenna Nowak1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Beth Rainey6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Carla Klumpp vs Sharon Balsamo / Stacy Faremouth4-6, 4-6
2022-10-17vs Riverstone - A MalletteWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Karey Hogan vs Thora Pentz / Heather Christie6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Kristine Laterra vs Anita Susco / Karen Tumulty6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
published
4.08
Tracy Maurer
published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
3.93
Emily Eldredge
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.90
Julie Mans
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kristen Catino
published
3.73
Karey Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Nancy Krueger
published
3.65
Carla Klumpp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Barger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Biqin Teng
published 4
3.60
Shelley Boggess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Melody Miller
published
3.48
Brenda Rhoda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Lauren Keillor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karyn Sardar
published
Mary Wright
published
Nancy Harbert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Klumpp + Shelley Boggess3459% games+18.2% vs expected
Kristen Catino + Nancy Krueger4166% games+16.2% vs expected
Lauren Keillor + Julie Mans211353% games+4.7% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Sunny Barger495049% games+3.6% vs expected
Carla Klumpp + Sunny Barger131547% games−3.8% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Lauren Keillor101149% games−4.8% vs expected
Nancy Harbert + Karyn Sardar9162% gamesnot enough data
Emily Eldredge + Sunny Barger5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mackenzie Rickman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Tracy Maurer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
Stephanie Foley
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Emily Eldredge
116W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Julie Mans
87W–44L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Nancy Krueger
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Sunny Barger
206W–211L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Biqin Teng
68W–71L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.62
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Melody Miller
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Brenda Rhoda
141W–148L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Karyn Sardar
22W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Wright
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Harbert
148W–83L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.