Teams

WNCB Cook (HRC)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2024 · 55 & O 3.5 women Sunday afternoon

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-25vs WNCM Padgett (ARC S)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Cook / TLynn Gilpin vs MARY PADGETT / Lisbeth Scharf6-2, 6-4
2024-04-27vs WNCA Rardin (Creekside)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Laurie Guinn vs Sallie LaChance / Marie Cowan2-6, 4-6
2024-04-21vs WNCB Brown (ARC S)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Angela Hare vs Susan Burns / Linda Steele6-2, 7-6
2024-04-07vs WNCA Lundahl (Aston)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Liddy / TLynn Gilpin vs Annie Lundahl / Scott Abernethy6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & O 3.5 women Sunday afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Sharlyn Aamodt
published
3.31
Laurie Guinn
published
3.31
Kelli Wood
published
3.28
Angela Hare
published 3.5
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
published
3.19
Kenna Armstrong
published
3.10
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
2.90
Sheri Sparks
published
2.90
Elaine Liddy
published 3
2.81
Loretta Arrington
published
Sharon Purcell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roberta Heinrich + Kelli Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Guinn + Angela Hare213 matchesnot enough data
Kelli Wood + TLynn Gilpin213 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Loretta Arrington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Sharlyn Aamodt
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Kelli Wood
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Angela Hare
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Roberta Heinrich
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Kenna Armstrong
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sheri Sparks
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elaine Liddy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Loretta Arrington
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Sharon Purcell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.