Teams

WNCA Rardin (Creekside)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2024 · 55 & O 3.5 women Sunday afternoon

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-28vs WNCB Brown (ARC S)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs Susan Burns / Linda Steele7-6, 6-3
2024-04-27vs WNCB Cook (HRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs TLynn Gilpin / Laurie Guinn6-2, 6-4
2024-04-14vs WNCA Lundahl (Aston)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSallie LaChance / Marie Cowan vs Sherrie Voyles / Elaine Dephouse6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & O 3.5 women Sunday afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Sallie LaChance
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Julia Hunt
published
3.38
Donna Davidson
published 3.5
3.32
Bedford Lally
published 3.5
3.30
Cindy Hile
published 3.5
Elizabeth Etheridge
published 3.5
Gaylord Chambers
published 3.5
3.22
Marie Cowan
published
3.20
3.14
MJ Baxter
published
3.14
Angie Rardin
published 3.5
Laura Copenhaver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Hile + Carolyn Marzendorfer4252% games−5.2% vs expected
Bedford Lally + Julia Hunt404 matchesnot enough data
Bedford Lally + MJ Baxter213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Hunt + Donna Davidson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sallie LaChance
140W–131L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
Julia Hunt
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Donna Davidson
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Bedford Lally
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Etheridge
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gaylord Chambers
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marie Cowan
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carolyn Marzendorfer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
MJ Baxter
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Angie Rardin
15W–29L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.14
Laura Copenhaver
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.