Teams

DaRosso Elite 18+ 9.0

2025 Howard Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.31 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-04-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Vicki Williamson vs Jennifer Lee / Michael Liu4-6, 5-7
2025-03-28vs Vissering - 9.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJulie Lazer / Mitchell Furst vs Jan Neumann / Heather Carr2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJake Lazer / Mary Jo Roberton vs Jonathan Vissering / Jennifer Mitchell3-6, 4-6
2025-03-21vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesMitchell Furst / Julie Lazer vs Justin Cady / Sarah Monsheimer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRick Overstreet / Mary Jo Roberton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-14vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Abruscato / Eboni Lance vs Bruce Fulton / Pamela Dean6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Kargus / Mary Jo Roberton vs Jay Anzures / Lolita Blair6-2, 6-1
2025-03-09vs Vissering - 9.0 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesEboni Lance / Matthew DaRosso vs Anita Pasumarthy / Austin Blake3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Lazer / Mitchell Furst vs Angel Batkins / Renaldo Savady2-6, 1-6
2025-02-16vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesMitchell Furst / Julie Lazer vs Jean Lim / Henry Cha2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJake Lazer / Beth Steinberg vs Sarah Monsheimer / Justin Cady6-2, 6-4
2025-02-09vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Eboni Lance vs Wendy Heger / Chris Miller2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Vissering - 9.0 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Rachel Martinez vs Matthew Geppi / Dao Phan-Vissering4-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTonya Crosley / Jake Lazer vs Marketa Chromkova / David Todd1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Robert Kargus vs Aisha Bhimla / Justin Cady5-7, 6-7
2025-01-19vs Trang - 9.0 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesJake Lazer / Beth Steinberg vs Wendy Heger / KHOURY ZIAD6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Vicki Williamson vs Chris Miller / Malika Rasheed6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Abruscato / Tatiana Loboda vs Laura McInerney / Kevin Yang6-3, 6-3
2025-01-10vs Vissering - 9.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJake Lazer / Beth Steinberg vs Ana Maria Pena Castro / Luis Lozano7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Lazer / Mitchell Furst vs Alison Bailey / Hung Nguyen0-6, 3-6
2025-01-05vs Cha - HoCoCha 9.0 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Lazer / Mitchell Furst vs Anne Tobin / Henry McVeigh4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Tatiana Loboda vs Eve Helmer / Jay Yee5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEboni Lance / Richard Abruscato vs Jin Lei / Koby Bonta6-1, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Jake Lazer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.44
Julie Lazer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
4.29
Robert Kargus
published
4.27
Rachel Martinez
published
4.11
Mitchell Furst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
4.09
Matthew DaRosso
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Rick Overstreet
published
3.92
Beth Steinberg
published 4.5
3.81
Mary Jo Roberton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Tonya Crosley
published
Richard Abruscato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Lazer + Mitchell Furst81447% games−17.3% vs expected
Jake Lazer + Julie Lazer2545% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jake Lazer
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Julie Lazer
29W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
Vicki Williamson
44W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.38
Robert Kargus
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
Rachel Martinez
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4
Mitchell Furst
21W–30L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Matthew DaRosso
30W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.09
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Rick Overstreet
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Mary Jo Roberton
144W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Tonya Crosley
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Richard Abruscato
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.