Teams

ACAC Krebs / Lewis

2023 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-24vs Woodlake Preston RacquettesLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Cindy Birnbaum3-6, 2-6
2023-08-14vs ACAC WEDDLE BAD NEWS BEARSLost 01
L#3 SinglesSandra Holahan vs Lara Hansen2-6, 2-6
2023-08-10vs HCC RossSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDawn Toft vs Joanna Bergeron1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Brittany Nichols6-4, 7-5
2023-07-20vs Belmont SherdelSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDawn Toft vs Shelly Galles2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSandra Holahan vs Stacy Sherdel6-0, 6-0
2023-07-13vs WOCC GregoryLost 01
L#2 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Rebecca Hendrix4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-11vs MAC HambrickLost 03
L#1 SinglesDawn Toft vs Katie Hambrick1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSandra Holahan vs Deirdre Vaughan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesFaith Kallman vs Lidia Cousins4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.51
Elham Tavassoli
published 3.5
3.43
Dawn Toft
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.23
Neki Grant
published
3.21
Anne Saunier
published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Lewis
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Sandra Holahan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Faith Kallman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Elham Tavassoli
59W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Dawn Toft
78W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Townsend
33W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Neki Grant
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anne Saunier
20W–29L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sandra Holahan
59W–94L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Faith Kallman
205W–166L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.