Teams

Cherokee/Laurie Schmidt

Cherokee Fall ('25) - Southern Combo 18 & Over · Women Combo 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-22vs Arbor View - HarrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Edler / Kathy von Broembsen vs Chinny Law / Emma Ku6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesForrest Bohannon / Jennifer Beebe vs Susie Ivy / Kimberly Sperling7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Michaels / Laurie Schmidt vs Danielle Smith / Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett1-6, 4-6
2025-09-15vs Arbor View - HarrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesForrest Bohannon / Alisa Price vs Emma Ku / Chinny Law6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Edler / Kathy von Broembsen vs Tiffany Simpson / Kimberly Sperling6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Beebe / Kay Moody vs Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett / Danielle Smith7-6, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Arbor View - HarrisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesForrest Bohannon / Alisa Price vs Susie Ivy / Kimberly Sperling6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKay Moody / Heather Robinson vs Teresa Keel / Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Michaels / Laurie Schmidt vs Tiffany Simpson / Erin Harrison3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Combo 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Alisa Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.47
Kathy von Broembsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Jennifer Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Michelle Edler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Heather Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Forrest Bohannon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Laurie Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Kay Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Christine Michaels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Heidi Ramaekers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy von Broembsen + Michelle Edler5163% games+6.1% vs expected
Forrest Bohannon + Jennifer Beebe10357% games+4.1% vs expected
Heather Robinson + Laurie Schmidt2355% games−0.5% vs expected
Christine Michaels + Kay Moody404 matchesnot enough data
Forrest Bohannon + Kay Moody303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alisa Price
24W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
Kathy von Broembsen
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.47
Jennifer Beebe
47W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Michelle Edler
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Heather Robinson
38W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Forrest Bohannon
48W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
4.17
Laurie Schmidt
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Kay Moody
112W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Christine Michaels
29W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Heidi Ramaekers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.