Teams

UPTA55C/Hendricks/Kroc

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-03vs UPTA55C/Powell/CardinalWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Norman / Tricia Socash vs Carrie Drennon / Deborah Powell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoyce Weiner / Francine Holmes vs Tari Dygert / Carole St-Laurent7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesArianna Harley / Nancy Pingitore vs Cathy Mays / Susan Poznick6-2, 6-2
2025-08-27vs UPTA55C/Clator/RiversideWon 21
L#1 DoublesIna Cottingham / Nancy Pingitore vs Cristina Koehler / Edie Clator6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJill Norman / Tricia Socash vs Teri Rushing / Suzanne Spotts6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Trotter Walker / Francine Holmes vs Susan Lackey / Liz Darrow5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs UPTA55C/Boliek/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim McFall / Holly Smith vs Lauren Demosthenes / Danette Kabas6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoyce Weiner / Tricia Socash vs Salli Alexander / Anna Turrentine2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Lucas / Jan Rice vs Beth Nichols / Alicia Sastry6-2, 6-4
2025-08-13vs UPTA55C/Dreiding/Holly TreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Norman / Tricia Socash vs Nancy Dreiding / Jean Kleis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIna Cottingham / Kim McFall vs Maureen McClintock / Catherine Erbacher6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJan Rice / Sarah Hendricks vs Melanie Greene / Leslie Carrico6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jill Norman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Arianna Harley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Tricia Socash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Jan Rice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kathleen Ryan
published
3.31
Stephanie Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Stephanie Trotter Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Ina Cottingham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Joyce Weiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Kim McFall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Nancy Pingitore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Francine Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Sarah Hendricks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Hendricks + Nancy Pingitore4166% games+10.9% vs expected
Francine Holmes + Kathleen Ryan8161% games+10.6% vs expected
Joyce Weiner + Stephanie Trotter Walker2347% games+6.0% vs expected
Sarah Hendricks + Francine Holmes2351% games+1.4% vs expected
Stephanie Trotter Walker + Francine Holmes314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hendricks + Kathleen Ryan404 matchesnot enough data
Ina Cottingham + Arianna Harley123 matchesnot enough data
Ina Cottingham + Jan Rice213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Norman
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
4
Arianna Harley
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Tricia Socash
27W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Jan Rice
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
Kathleen Ryan
39W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Stephanie Lucas
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Stephanie Trotter Walker
34W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Ina Cottingham
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Joyce Weiner
28W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Kim McFall
39W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Nancy Pingitore
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Francine Holmes
144W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Sarah Hendricks
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.