Teams

UPTA55C/Powell/Cardinal

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-24vs UPTA55C/Clator/RiversideLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Powell / Susan Krzeminski vs Susan Lackey / Edie Clator4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarole St-Laurent / Tari Dygert vs Mary Anne Larkin / Justine Allen6-7
L#3 DoublesCynthia Forbes / Katherine Robinson vs Suzanne Morris / Catherine Hunt1-6, 2-6
2025-09-17vs UPTA55C/Boliek/GCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarole St-Laurent / Tari Dygert vs Kathy Cottingham / Joan Herlong4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Forbes / Katherine Robinson vs Beth Nichols / Alicia Sastry6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Mays / Susan Poznick vs Harriet Gray / Lauren Demosthenes2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-03vs UPTA55C/Hendricks/KrocLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Drennon / Deborah Powell vs Jill Norman / Tricia Socash3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTari Dygert / Carole St-Laurent vs Joyce Weiner / Francine Holmes6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Mays / Susan Poznick vs Arianna Harley / Nancy Pingitore2-6, 2-6
2025-08-27vs UPTA55C/Johnson/SpindletreeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackie Walker / Carole St-Laurent vs Karen Johnson / Jacquie Eddy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Mays / Deborah Powell vs Tarina Mendes / Cheryl Blalock6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Krzeminski / Nancy Lanois vs Lisa Maly / Rachel Ashley2-6, 3-6
2025-08-13vs UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/KeoweeKeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Walker / Cynthia Forbes vs Karen Penoncello / Melissa Coles0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarole St-Laurent / Tari Dygert vs Deb Galinsky / Dana Loring7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Mays / Deborah Powell vs Pamela Turner / Wendy Jakszta2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Susan Poznick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Cathy Mays
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Carrie Drennon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Jackie Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Carole St-Laurent
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Christi Silverstein
published 3.5
Cornelia Buch
published 3.5
3.25
Tari Dygert
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Deborah Powell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Denise Malone
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Rebecca Gruendling
published
3.02
Susan Krzeminski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Nancy Lanois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Katherine Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole St-Laurent + Tari Dygert4448% games−8.3% vs expected
Denise Malone + Katherine Robinson101346% games−8.4% vs expected
Susan Poznick + Cathy Mays1537% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Powell + Tari Dygert2351% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Jackie Walker3248% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Tari Dygert134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Lanois + Susan Krzeminski224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Lanois + Katherine Robinson044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Poznick
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Cathy Mays
9W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Drennon
20W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jackie Walker
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Carole St-Laurent
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Christi Silverstein
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cornelia Buch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tari Dygert
43W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
3.5
Deborah Powell
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Denise Malone
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Forbes
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Rebecca Gruendling
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Susan Krzeminski
36W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Nancy Lanois
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Katherine Robinson
17W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.