Teams

UPTA55C/Eleftheriou/KeoweeKey

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-17vs UPTA55C/Clator/RiversideWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Penoncello / Sharon Thomas vs Cristina Koehler / Edie Clator7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Turner / Wendy Jakszta vs Birgitte Ahrberg / Suzanne Spotts6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Johnna Neri vs Alison Frazier / Liz Darrow6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-03vs UPTA55C/Boliek/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Pitcairn / Melissa Coles vs Rae Sobocinski / Dawn Lucas6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeb Galinsky / Sandra Franklin vs Anna Turrentine / Rhonda Jackson7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristine Woerz / Pamela Turner vs Cindy Cannon / Kathy Cottingham6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-20vs UPTA55C/Dreiding/Holly TreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Penoncello / Johnna Neri vs Vera McCray / Taunya Haun0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Eleftheriou / Patricia Joy vs Missy Wiseman / Jean Kleis6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Gardiner / Sandra Franklin vs Deborah Buley / Lisa Bertling6-4, 6-3
2025-08-13vs UPTA55C/Powell/CardinalWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Penoncello / Melissa Coles vs Jackie Walker / Cynthia Forbes6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDeb Galinsky / Dana Loring vs Carole St-Laurent / Tari Dygert7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Turner / Wendy Jakszta vs Cathy Mays / Deborah Powell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Karen Penoncello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Mary Gardiner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Cindy Eleftheriou
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Deb Galinsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Pamela Turner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Patricia Joy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Dana Loring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Coles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Sharon Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Julie Pitcairn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Christine Woerz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Johnna Neri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Wendy Jakszta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Turner + Wendy Jakszta4356% games+21.8% vs expected
Sharon Thomas + Wendy Jakszta4457% games+14.8% vs expected
Sharon Thomas + Patricia Joy4156% games+11.6% vs expected
Wendy Jakszta + Dana Loring5453% games+6.2% vs expected
Christine Woerz + Johnna Neri2355% games−1.0% vs expected
Karen Penoncello + Cindy Eleftheriou16558% games−1.6% vs expected
Deb Galinsky + Pamela Turner6361% games−4.7% vs expected
Cindy Eleftheriou + Patricia Joy3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penoncello
25W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Mary Gardiner
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Eleftheriou
30W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Deb Galinsky
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Pamela Turner
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Patricia Joy
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Dana Loring
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Sharon Thomas
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.21
Julie Pitcairn
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Woerz
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Johnna Neri
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.98
Wendy Jakszta
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Sandra Franklin
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.