Teams

OV Combo 7.5M Johannes (QRRC)

2022 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 7.5 Combo Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-21vs STC-SayerWon 30
W#1 DoublesEnrico Ferri / Adam Beiersdorfer vs Alex Anderson / Chris Schlater7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRodolfo Aguilera / Jason Merkle vs Ron Stenger / Stephen Coates2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBart Grunenwald / William Baldwin vs Tim Sayer / Jeffrey Dunker6-2, 6-2
2022-07-24vs WPAFB-HonoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhilip Vandeursen / Nathan Fullington vs Douglas Iden / Wyatt Melloy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Thomeczek / Rodolfo Aguilera vs Joseph Graham / Greg Haack6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEnrico Ferri / Keith Boroczk vs Tony Brown / Ed Honore6-0, 6-2
2022-07-17vs WPAFB-HonoreWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Beiersdorfer / Steve Johannes vs Tony Brown / Greg Haack6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Thomeczek / Rodolfo Aguilera vs Joseph Graham / Wyatt Melloy7-6, 6-4
2022-07-10vs STC-SayerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Dadaian / Alexander Boardman vs Jeffrey Dunker / Ron Stenger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Merkle / William Baldwin vs Kevin Fraker / Alex Anderson2-6, 4-6
2022-06-12vs WPAFB-HonoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Merkle / Keith Boroczk vs Daniel Henderson / Emanuel Papp6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Beiersdorfer / Bart Grunenwald vs Tony Brown / Joseph Graham6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShaun Johannes / Steve Johannes vs Claudio Bellini / Ed Honore6-2, 6-1
2022-06-05vs STC-SayerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexander Boardman / Michael Dadaian vs Jason Johnston / Nathan Lucas6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteve Johannes / Nathan Fullington vs Stephen Coates / Kevin Fraker4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShaun Johannes / Enrico Ferri vs Tim Sayer / Nathan Kleptz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OV Combo 7.5M Johannes (QRRC)601626103
2STC-Sayer3310816122
3WPAFB-Honore0611734205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Alexander Boardman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Enrico Ferri
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Jason Merkle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.79
Adam Beiersdorfer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Nathan Fullington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Philip Vandeursen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Bart Grunenwald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Brian Thomeczek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Shaun Johannes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Rodolfo Aguilera
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Steve Johannes
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Michael Dadaian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Keith Boroczk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Johannes + Brian Thomeczek6363% games+8.1% vs expected
Enrico Ferri + Adam Beiersdorfer2647% games+4.5% vs expected
Jason Merkle + Enrico Ferri3352% games+4.2% vs expected
Brian Thomeczek + Enrico Ferri10752% games+3.7% vs expected
Alexander Boardman + Michael Dadaian5258% games+2.5% vs expected
Brian Thomeczek + Adam Beiersdorfer5350% games−2.7% vs expected
Brian Thomeczek + Rodolfo Aguilera7066% gamesnot enough data
Alexander Boardman + Jason Merkle5160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexander Boardman
139W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Enrico Ferri
143W–91L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Jason Merkle
236W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Adam Beiersdorfer
137W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Nathan Fullington
51W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Philip Vandeursen
67W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bart Grunenwald
38W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brian Thomeczek
68W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Shaun Johannes
78W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Rodolfo Aguilera
149W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Steve Johannes
141W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Michael Dadaian
67W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
Keith Boroczk
87W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.