Teams

Berkman-Sucks to suck

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Tarynn Berkman
published 4.5
4.05
Mary Green-Zwemke
published 4.5
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2022-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Mary Green-Zwemke vs Diana Callaway / Michele Desmarais6-1, 6-2
2022-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / Heike Droste vs Kristin Taylor / Zhi George7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Heike Droste vs Kelly Mohr / Karen Dellinger6-2, 6-3
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeike Droste / Mary Green-Zwemke vs Melissa Light / Ginny Ehrlich6-0, 6-3
2022-07-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / Cassia Carpio vs Carrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff6-4, 6-3
2022-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Mary Green-Zwemke vs Kayleen Mendenhall / Valerie Wright7-6, 6-4
2022-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Cassia Carpio vs Judith Kobin / Anne Fahlbusch7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Tarynn Berkman
78W–28L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4.5
Mary Green-Zwemke
79W–32L career
7%93%0%
4.05
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.