Teams

CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Josie Calanni
published
3.84
Kim Rasmussen
published
3.78
Molly McGee
published
Asuman Johnson
published 4
3.75
Laura Forlini
published
3.71
Jo Ann Magpusao
published
3.58
Lisa Barnett
published
3.55
Sonya Abeyta
published
3.54
Tammara Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Julie Walton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Christina Roger
published 3.5
3.19
Linda Scholink
published
Jeter Stanford
published
Julie A Vucina
published
Kathy Mondragon
published
Molly Espiritu
published
Pauline Meyer
published
Priscilla Henry
published
Rosemary Favazza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Walton + Tammara Chavez10160% games+2.2% vs expected
Josie Calanni + Tammara Chavez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josie Calanni
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Kim Rasmussen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Molly McGee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Asuman Johnson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Forlini
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
Jo Ann Magpusao
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Lisa Barnett
49W–40L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Sonya Abeyta
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Tammara Chavez
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Julie Walton
15W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Christina Roger
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Linda Scholink
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Jeter Stanford
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie A Vucina
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Mondragon
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Espiritu
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pauline Meyer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Henry
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Favazza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.