Teams

Veltri - Wank

2022 Broward TriLevel · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.14 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-05vs Piccolo - GiraldoLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Williams / Lorena Villar vs Gretchyn Wagner / Maria Montoto6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrooke Oransky / Veronica Wank vs Camila Giraldo / Elena Sise1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Williams / Maria Brozzi vs Maria Montoto / Daniela Hernandez3-6, 4-6
2022-09-19vs Ltc/Dillon - SmartAcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Brozzi / Karen Williams vs Frances Cubano / Mari Bianco5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-25vs Piccolo - MoratoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Rickey / Veronica Wank vs Upasna Jha / Rosa Waters6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalia de Gregorio / Maria Brozzi vs Angelica Baez / Carolina Santos-Mayi4-6, 4-6
2022-08-15vs Ltc/Dillon - SmartAcesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLorena Villar / Karen Williams vs Loren Levine / Edith Schmidt7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMariel Cordero / Brooke Oransky vs Natasha Torres / Caprice Thomas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-25vs Broward/Midtown - MecheLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Oransky / Mariel Cordero vs Natalia Moll / Rosamaria Rodriguez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Brooke Oransky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Mariel Cordero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Jill Rickey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Veronica Wank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Sharon Tompkins
published
3.79
Lorena Villar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Natalia de Gregorio
published
3.43
Maria Brozzi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Evelyn Daniels
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorena Villar + Jill Rickey5356% gamesnot enough data
Mariel Cordero + Brooke Oransky4353% gamesnot enough data
Jill Rickey + Veronica Wank2347% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Oransky + Veronica Wank3256% gamesnot enough data
Jill Rickey + Brooke Oransky134 matchesnot enough data
Mariel Cordero + Veronica Wank213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Oransky
49W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Mariel Cordero
97W–93L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Jill Rickey
109W–122L career · 1 line in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Lorena Villar
207W–130L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Natalia de Gregorio
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Maria Brozzi
152W–217L career · 3 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Evelyn Daniels
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.