Teams

FSSC Moss (Lehner)

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.88 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-03vs QRRC HeinzLost 02
L#1 DoublesReid Wynkoop / Cole Moss vs Austin Staiger / David Peyton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilbur Lin vs Todd Rich0-6, 0-6
2025-04-27vs QRRC HeinzLost 02
L#1 DoublesReid Wynkoop / Brian Dean vs David Peyton / Alexander Boardman3-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesConrad Klank / Richard Heilman vs Luke Hoban / Donovan Christman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-05vs QRRC HeinzWon 21
L#1 DoublesReid Wynkoop / Richard Heilman vs Austin Staiger / Matt Poulos3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCole Moss vs Alexander Boardman6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWilbur Lin / Philip Brumbaugh vs Jeremy Flora / Darrin Heinz6-3, 6-4
2025-03-22vs QRRC HeinzWon 20
W#1 DoublesYakov Diskin / Reid Wynkoop vs Matt Poulos / David Peyton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWilbur Lin vs Alexander Boardman7-5, 7-5
2025-03-08vs QRRC HeinzLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilip Brumbaugh / Cole Moss vs Patrick Hagan / Matt Poulos2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWilbur Lin vs Alexander Boardman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYakov Diskin / Conrad Klank vs Darrin Heinz / David Peyton3-6, 2-6
2025-01-25vs QRRC HeinzLost 12
W#1 DoublesYakov Diskin / Ethan Libby vs Darrin Heinz / Austin Staiger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWilbur Lin vs Michael Hall2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Heilman / Reid Wynkoop vs Patrick Hagan / Matt Poulos2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FSSC Moss (Lehner)2481023164

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ethan Libby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.56
Cole Moss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.42
Reid Wynkoop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Wilbur Lin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Philip Brumbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Conrad Klank
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Brian Dean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Heilman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Santiago Diaz Lopez
published
Toshiyuki Watanabe
published
Yakov Diskin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Conrad Klank + Yakov Diskin3259% games+7.2% vs expected
Cole Moss + Philip Brumbaugh134 matchesnot enough data
Wilbur Lin + Richard Heilman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Estrada-Sanchez
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Ethan Libby
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Cole Moss
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.56
Reid Wynkoop
62W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
Wilbur Lin
55W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Philip Brumbaugh
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Conrad Klank
40W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Brian Dean
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Heilman
58W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Santiago Diaz Lopez
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Toshiyuki Watanabe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yakov Diskin
33W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.