Teams

QRRC Heinz

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.67 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-03vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Staiger / David Peyton vs Reid Wynkoop / Cole Moss6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-27vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Peyton / Alexander Boardman vs Reid Wynkoop / Brian Dean6-3, 3-2
W#2 DoublesLuke Hoban / Donovan Christman vs Conrad Klank / Richard Heilman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-05vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAustin Staiger / Matt Poulos vs Reid Wynkoop / Richard Heilman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexander Boardman vs Cole Moss3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeremy Flora / Darrin Heinz vs Wilbur Lin / Philip Brumbaugh3-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatt Poulos / David Peyton vs Yakov Diskin / Reid Wynkoop6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlexander Boardman vs Wilbur Lin5-7, 5-7
2025-03-08vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Hagan / Matt Poulos vs Philip Brumbaugh / Cole Moss6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlexander Boardman vs Wilbur Lin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDarrin Heinz / David Peyton vs Yakov Diskin / Conrad Klank6-3, 6-2
2025-01-25vs FSSC Moss (Lehner)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Austin Staiger vs Yakov Diskin / Ethan Libby4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Hagan / Matt Poulos vs Richard Heilman / Reid Wynkoop6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Austin Staiger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
Matt Poulos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.58
Donovan Christman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.43
Darrin Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.40
Scott Shope
published
4.39
David Peyton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.39
Andrew Knutson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Luke Hoban
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Jeremy Flora
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Alexander Boardman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Murad Nawaz
published
Patrick Hagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Rich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Peyton + Alexander Boardman3360% games+8.8% vs expected
Matt Poulos + Patrick Hagan5162% games+3.8% vs expected
David Peyton + Jeremy Flora5553% games−1.2% vs expected
Darrin Heinz + Jeremy Flora6358% games−1.4% vs expected
Alexander Boardman + Jeremy Flora10156% games−1.8% vs expected
Scott Shope + Darrin Heinz3248% gamesnot enough data
David Peyton + Darrin Heinz4166% gamesnot enough data
Donovan Christman + Jeremy Flora4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Staiger
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Poulos
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.66
5
Donovan Christman
112W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.58
4.5
Darrin Heinz
77W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.43
Scott Shope
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
David Peyton
62W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Andrew Knutson
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
Luke Hoban
98W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.37
Jeremy Flora
117W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Alexander Boardman
139W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Murad Nawaz
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Hagan
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Rich
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.