Teams

1-JYoung-ENO

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-26vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Deborah Hertzog7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKaren Sonders vs Joanie Preyer6-3, 6-4
2024-11-19vs 2-MLong2-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJonda Young vs Lisa Baxter0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-12vs 3-MFulton-UNCLost 12
W#1 SinglesKaren Sonders vs Courtney Mills6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJessica Nagy vs Erin Berliner4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Sara Knechtel1-6, 5-7
2024-11-05vs 7-GLoFrese-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Kellianne White4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Juliana Maul6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-22vs 5-MLong-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Cecilia Gonzales2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJessica Nagy vs Aine Lynch1-6, 3-6
2024-10-20vs 6-ACombs-CCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaren Sonders vs Thuy Brooks6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Stephanie Terrey5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Karen Sonders
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.01
Lindsay Mize
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jessica Nagy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Lucy McMillan
published
2.54
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Lindsay Mize10269% games+14.8% vs expected
Lindsay Mize + Jessica Nagy5556% gamesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Pamela Howell-Davis2637% gamesnot enough data
Loralie Bible + Jessica Nagy404 matchesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Loralie Bible213 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Howell-Davis + Lucy McMillan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3
Karen Sonders
50W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Jessica Nagy
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Lucy McMillan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
119W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.