Teams

OC YLCC - Sheri - Sun3

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#3 DoublesSheri Kumsakul / Valerie Armijo vs Tricia Bregman / Maribeth F Rodriguez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCandi Maher / Melissa Patterson vs Ellen Aistars / Dana Orsini1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Nieto vs Caroline Gee1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmee Patel / Kristine Levenson vs Allie Bertocchini / Amy Hicks2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesValerie Armijo / Christin Raymond vs Erin Freimann / Rita Haddad2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSandy Swearingen / Karin Altonaga vs Xuan Le / Carol Melvin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGina Moore / Susan Leonardi vs Kim Quaglierini / Dana Buckley2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristine Levenson / Evi Dewhurst vs Deborah Eskenazi / Susan Welsh7-6, 4-4
L#1 DoublesSheri Kumsakul / Teresa Yochum vs Cassie Hadfield / Melissa McCullough0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Candi Maher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christina Nihira
published 3.5
3.24
Sandy Swearingen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Valerie Armijo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Rebecca Budai
published
3.12
Noemi Rodriguez
published
3.03
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
M E Vasquez-Mesa
published
2.97
Christin Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Gina Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Teresa Yochum
published
2.87
Amee Patel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Jennifer Nieto
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Angela DeCuir
published 3
2.72
Susan Leonardi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Evi Dewhurst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Kristine Levenson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Karin Altonaga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

M E Vasquez-Mesa + Evi Dewhurst2439% games−8.0% vs expected
Sandy Swearingen + Candi Maher213 matchesnot enough data
Evi Dewhurst + Kristine Levenson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Candi Maher
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Christina Nihira
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Swearingen
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Valerie Armijo
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Rebecca Budai
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Noemi Rodriguez
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
M E Vasquez-Mesa
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Christin Raymond
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Gina Moore
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Teresa Yochum
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amee Patel
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Jennifer Nieto
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Angela DeCuir
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Leonardi
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Evi Dewhurst
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Kristine Levenson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Karin Altonaga
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.