Teams

OC Irvine Heritage Park Irvine - Dianne - Sun11

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesTiffney Beckloff / Cassie Hadfield vs Abby Bradecich / Lailai Ho7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCecilia Mai / Fay Shao vs Lisabeth Grimm / Irene Wang6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFay Shao / Cecilia Mai vs Gilda Banta / Katherine Bleakley6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDiane Kim / Dianne Tanger vs Ellen Aistars / Jill Brown2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCassie Hadfield / Maureen Dominguez vs Dana Orsini / Rita Haddad6-4, 7-6
2025-02-22vs OC YLCC - Sheri - Sun3Won 30
W#1 DoublesCassie Hadfield / Melissa McCullough vs Sheri Kumsakul / Teresa Yochum6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDiane Kim / Dianne Tanger vs Susan Aldrich / Rebecca Budai3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFay Shao / Trang Phan vs Noemi Rodriguez / Kristine Levenson6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMaria des Dorides / Cassie Hadfield vs Sharon Diekneit / Mary Goff1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCecilia Mai / Fay Shao vs Eugenia Shkel / Valerie del Valle6-3, 6-4
2025-02-09vs OC LPC Irvine - Debra - Sun9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDianne Tanger / Maria des Dorides vs Jennifer Xu / Christine Ly4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiffney Beckloff / Cassie Hadfield vs Alicia Callanan / Trisha Seminoff2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCecilia Mai / Fay Shao vs Dee Harriman / Nancy Marcosa6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Shiva Shokouhi6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDianne Tanger vs Dana Buckley6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Kim
published 4
3.62
Monica Anderson
published
3.58
Cassie Hadfield
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.57
Dianne Tanger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Nicole Festini
published
3.38
Maureen Dominguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Stacey Choi
published
3.23
Fay Shao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Cecilia Mai
published 3.5
3.13
Christina Case
published 3.5
3.13
Melissa McCullough
published
3.13
Sandra Patel
published
3.10
Nancy Montez
published
3.09
Gemma Snell
published
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria des Dorides
published
Trang Phan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Festini + Stacey Choi9655% games+14.8% vs expected
Maureen Dominguez + Cassie Hadfield12261% games+5.9% vs expected
Christina Case + Sandra Patel61144% games+1.8% vs expected
Cecilia Mai + Fay Shao4350% games+1.5% vs expected
Melissa McCullough + Sandra Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Kim
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Anderson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cassie Hadfield
62W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Dianne Tanger
47W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Maureen Dominguez
122W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stacey Choi
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Fay Shao
49W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Cecilia Mai
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christina Case
11W–26L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Melissa McCullough
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Nancy Montez
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gemma Snell
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Maria des Dorides
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trang Phan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.